home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   CONSPRCY      How big is your tinfoil hat?      2,445 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,387 of 2,445   
   Mike Powell to All   
   Ring cuts ties with Flock   
   13 Feb 26 11:25:42   
   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 2145.consprcy@1:2320/105 2df48ee7   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   Ring cuts ties with controversial police tech company after 'dystopian' Super   
   Bowl ad sparks a huge backlash   
      
   By David Nield published 4 hours ago   
      
   Can Ring be trusted?   
      
       Ring is severing its ties with Flock Safety, linked to law enforcement   
       Critics are accusing Ring of rolling out 'mass surveillance'   
       A new Search Party advert has also raised concerns about privacy   
      
   Facing increasing criticism over its policies on privacy and data sharing, the   
   Amazon-owned Ring has severed ties with surveillance tech company Flock Safety   
   - although it may not be enough to appease many of its critics.   
      
   "We determined the planned Flock Safety integration would require significantly   
   more time and resources than anticipated," says Ring (via The Verge). "As a   
   result, we have made the joint decision to cancel the planned integration."   
      
   Ring also confirmed the integration never actually launched, despite being   
   announced last October, so no data has been sent between the two companies.   
   Flock Safety is known to work with government and law enforcement agencies,   
   including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).   
      
   The Ring and Flock Safety partnership was part of Ring's Community Requests   
   feature, where users can opt to share camera footage with local police to help   
   in active investigations. That program is continuing, and Ring points out that   
   it helped identify a key witness in the Brown University shooting in December   
   2025.   
      
   "We remain focused on building tools that empower neighbors to help one another   
   while maintaining strong privacy protections and transparency about how our   
   features work," says Ring. "We'll continue to carefully evaluate future   
   partnerships to ensure they align with our standards for customer trust,   
   safety, and privacy."   
      
   With added facial recognition   
      
   A few days ago, Ring also released a new advert showing off its Search Party   
   feature, which has drawn further complaints from critics, who described it as   
   "dystopian" - although, like the Flock Safety integration, this isn't new and   
   was unveiled last year.  The idea with Search Party is that if a dog goes   
   missing, local Ring cameras are used to help spot it. It's enabled by default,   
   so you need to opt out if you don't like it - but Ring says more than a dog a   
   day has been found by Search Party since it launched.   
      
   Finding lost pooches is a laudable goal, but there are concerns that the same   
   setup could easily be used to track people. US Senator Ed Markey has described   
   Search Party as a "mass surveillance" system, especially given that Ring   
   products can now be programmed to recognize familiar faces too.   
      
   Ring says facial recognition data is kept private and secure, and can improve   
   security by letting you know if it's a family member or a stranger wandering   
   about your property. It's also a feature available on other security cameras,   
   including Google Nest Cams. However, users are far from convinced that Ring can   
   be trusted.   
      
   The problem is not the advertised capabilities, but how they could be   
   repurposed in the future, either with or without public knowledge - a debate   
   on trust and privacy that will no doubt continue. It seems that plenty of   
   people have already had enough of Ring's approach, and are returning their   
   cameras.   
      
      
   https://www.techradar.com/home/smart-home/ring-cuts-ties-with-controversial-pol   
   ice-tech-company-after-dystopian-super-bowl-ad-sparks-a-huge-backlash   
      
   $$   
   --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux   
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca