Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,275 of 2,445    |
|    Mike Powell to All    |
|    AI must prove real-world    |
|    22 Jan 26 10:21:30    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 2033.consprcy@1:2320/105 2dd77e6b       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed       Microsoft CEO urges AI developers to get to a point where we are using this        to do something useful, or lose even the social permission...to generate        these tokens              Date:       Thu, 22 Jan 2026 04:00:00 +0000              Description:       Satya Nadella used his Davos platform to warn that AIs future hinges on       proving real-world utility.              FULL STORY              Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella is concerned that if artificial intelligence       doesnt start delivering real, measurable benefits to society, people will be       fed up with it and its price, ending its current form of existence. The Davos       stage is an odd venue and audience to preach societal good over other goods,       but it certainly helped his comments stand out.               AI developers "have to get to a point where we are using this to do something       useful that changes the outcomes of people and communities and countries and       industries. Otherwise, I don't think this makes much sense," Nadella        explained during a conversation with BlackRock CEO Larry Fink.               "We will quickly lose even the social permission to take something like       energy, which is a scarce resource, and use it to generate these tokens, if       these tokens are not improving health outcomes, education outcomes, public       sector efficiency, private sector competitiveness, across all sectors, small       and large."               The Davos crowd, used to a more digital transformation cheerleading role,       sounded a little confused. But the discussion also shows how the AI hype        train is both an illusion and real. Nadella should know what he's talking       about. Microsoft is one of the biggest drivers of the current AI boom, with       tens of billions of dollars invested in OpenAI, its own Copilot suite baked       into productivity tools, and a seat at nearly every major AI policy table.               But his message at Davos was that leadership now demands a reckoning not        just about how smart or useful AI tools are in theory, but whether theyre       helping people in schools, clinics, small businesses, and city governments.               Thats not an abstract moral argument. Its an infrastructure one. AIs growth       has been driven by immense computational muscle, which means its also driven       by massive energy use. Training today's biggest models consumes as much       electricity as some small countries consume in a year.               And inference, when you run the model on your phone or desktop to answer a       question or generate a response, adds to that cost every second it runs. AI       doesnt just use servers; it fuels an ever-expanding footprint of data        centers, water-cooled systems, and grid-straining workloads.               Nadellas social permission phrase gets to the heart of what might be next.       Until now, the public has broadly accepted that cloud-based tech companies        can use resources in exchange for productivity, entertainment, or        convenience. But that goodwill isnt guaranteed. If AI begins to look like a       wasteful luxury, delivering novelty rather than necessity, citizens and       governments may start to push back.              Value for AI energy               During the session, Larry Fink asked whether all this productivity talk would       mean fewer jobs, and Nadella didnt dismiss the concern. But he argued that        AIs potential lies in amplifying what people can do.               But this moment is different from past tech inflection points. The sheer        scale of AI's appetite. Cloud computing scaled gradually. Smartphones had       physical limits. But AI can grow as fast as the models and capital behind it       allow. Thats why Nadellas call to focus on outcomes comes off as cautious as       well as pragmatic.               Nadellas message was simple but sharp: we are nearing the edge of public       tolerance for black-box systems powered by opaque amounts of energy, with       unclear societal benefits.               And maybe we should all be asking harder questions when the next shiny AI        tool drops: Does this help me? Does it help someone? Or is it just burning       energy to generate yet another token?               ======================================================================       Link to news story:       https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/microsoft-ceo-urges-ai-devel       opers-to-get-to-a-point-where-we-are-using-this-to-do-something-useful-or-lose       -even-the-social-permission-to-generate-these-tokens              $$       --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux        * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470       SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca