Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,223 of 2,445    |
|    Mike Powell to All    |
|    It will refuse to produce    |
|    15 Jan 26 09:39:42    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1981.consprcy@1:2320/105 2dce39eb       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed       It will refuse to produce anything illegal: Elon Musk rails against Grok       backlash, but UK Prime Minister says were not going to back down              Date:       Wed, 14 Jan 2026 19:24:33 +0000              Description:       X CEO Elon Musk disputes image generation charges leveled at Grok AI.              FULL STORY       ======================================================================        Elon Musk defends Grok AI        Insists it never created certain kinds of images        The UK is not done investigating the platform              Elon Musk said that he's aware of "literally zero" naked underage images       generated by Grok AI, in a Wednesday post on X. It's the first public comment       beyond emojis the X CEO has made on the controversy, though it may do little       to satisfy critics.              Grok AI ran into trouble last week after Reuters reported that the Grok AI       platform, which is accessible separately and through X, was "flooding" X        with "sexualized photos of women and minors." It's not news that Grok can       generate racy images from prompts. Musk has posted his share of idealized       images of women in bustiers, but these allegations go further.               In the report, Reuters recounted the story of a woman whose photo with her        cat was transformed by a Grok prompt of an image of her in a tiny bikini.       There are also claims that Grok is generating images of sexualized minors.               The report and growing concern led to Grok AI being banned in Malaysia and       Indonesia, and the UK's OFCOM launching an investigation into X . X and Musk       never directly addressed the allegations (until now), but it already took       steps to staunch the flow of such images. Image generation has, for instance,       been put behind the Grok AI paywall (an action that some say does little to       address the problem). And The Telegraph reported that Grok AI will ignore       requests to create these kinds of images.               Musk's comments (below), though, appear to argue against a never leveled       charge: the creation of nude imagery of minors:                "[I'm] not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally       zero.              "Obviously, Grok does not spontaneously generate images, it does so only       according to user requests.               "When asked to generate images, it will refuse to produce anything illegal,       as the operating principle for Grok is to obey the laws of any given country       or state.               "There may be times when adversarial hacking of Grok prompts does something       unexpected. If that happens, we fix the bug immediately."              Musk is also making a point that is true of virtually all generative AI       platforms: they do not generate imagery without a prompt. Users are writing       the prompts and asking Grok to remove clothing and replace it with bikinis.               Musk's statement about the refusal to create illegal imagery aligns with       previous statements Musk has made on free speech: his platforms will follow       the law, and he added in a 2022 X post , "I am against censorship that goes       far beyond the law."               That last bit is perhaps why Grok AI has run afoul of some commonly        understood content standards. Grok AI is generally a platform that will       happily flout intellectual property laws. In general, it has a snarkier       personality and is more open to a wider variety of prompts. Though with the       realization that Grok AI perhaps didn't know where to draw the line, that       stance is now clearly changing.               Is it changing fast enough? Trust but verify               UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer previously called Grok AI "disgusting,"        and though clearly pleased that Grok AI has taken measures to stop the flow        of these images, he, according to the BBC, retained a hard line.               "If so, that is welcome, but we're not going to back down, and they must act.       We will take the necessary measures. We will strengthen existing laws and       prepare for legislation if it needs to go further, and Ofcom will continue        its independent investigation."               It's unlikely that we'll hear a more in-depth response from Musk, whose last       point is that, perhaps, some of what we saw was due to "adversarial hacking"       that leads to "something unexpected". In other words, bugs that are easily       fixed.               This week hasn't been all bad news for X and Grok AI. Even as other countries       are investigating and banning X and its AI platform, the US Department of       Defense announced a plan to integrate Grok AI into its own networks . That       should be... interesting.               ======================================================================       Link to news story:       https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/it-will-refuse-to-produce-an       ything-illegal-elon-musk-rails-against-grok-backlash-but-uk-prime-minister-say       s-were-not-going-to-back-down              $$       --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux        * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470       SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca