Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,110 of 2,445    |
|    Mike Powell to All    |
|    In-car touchscreens way m    |
|    22 Dec 25 09:28:38    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1867.consprcy@1:2320/105 2dae92e1       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed        [in 2013, I leased a vehicle that had a touchscreen. In 2016, I requested       one that had the more "spartan" controls. They are a lot less distracting,       and are a lot less likely to malfunction! -- Mike]              Shock, horror! In-car touchscreens are way more distracting than we first       thought, says new study              Date:       Mon, 22 Dec 2025 13:54:11 +0000              Description:       New research suggests that using a touchscreen when behind the wheel makes        you a pretty terrible driver.              FULL STORY              The results of a new study by the University of Washington (UW) and Toyota       Research Institute have provided pretty daming evidence against the use of       large, distracting touchscreens when driving a vehicle.               Rather eloquently titled Touchscreens in Motion: Quantifying the Impact of       Cognitive Load on Distracted Drivers, the study saw 16 participants placed in       ultra-realistic high-fidelity driving simulators while researchers tracked        eye and hand movements, pupil dilation, and skin conductivity.               Participants were asked to drive around a typical urban environment and then       interact with various side-tasks presented on the touchscreen ; nothing        major, simply adjusting car functionality or changing the radio station.               Their ability to both drive and their accuracy when interacting with the       touchscreen were measured.               According to Car Scoops , the researchers measured a mix of driver        performance metrics and physiological markers, from eye movements, index       finger tracking and steering consistency to reaction time and stress signals.       This helped them build a better picture of stress and cognitive load on the       human in the driving seat.               As you would expect, the results werent pretty for those peddling an        increased reliance on touchscreens over physical buttons. Firstly, pointing       accuracy on said touchscreen and the speed of use were reduced by more than       58% when compared to non-driving conditions.               Already, this reveals that us humans struggle to physically interact with a       touchscreen when busy processing whats going on out of the windscreen of a       moving vehicle. This then requires the driver to apply more focus to tapping       digital menu screens.               As a result, the study revealed that lane deviation increased by over 40%        once touchscreen interaction was introduced. The vicious cycle then        continues.              Bring back buttons              We have already covered this extensively , but some manufacturers are       reintroducing physical buttons for often-used features in a vehicle. This is,       in part, a reaction to consumer backlash, but also because some of the        leading safety bodies will penalize automakers for an over-reliance on       touchscreens in the future.               I strongly believe that things like volume control, lighting, window       de-misters and windscreen wipers should all be mapped to physical buttons        that can be committed to muscle memory after a few uses.               This means drivers dont have to go hunting through often hyper-sensitive       touchscreens to activate very basic functionality. Getting stuck in a loop of       mis-tapping, shuffling through incorrect menus or activating the wrong       function is frustrating but also very dangerous.               The research conducted by the University of Washington (UW) and Toyota       Research Institute suggests automakers look to reduce the number of menus       required to perform a function, with hard-buttons implemented that can be       customized to jump to the most used items.               Otherwise, it states that future systems should get smarter and adapt when it       detects the driver is becoming more distracted, by enlarging buttons or       limiting some functions when it deems things are becoming unsafe.               Unfortunately, it's simply much cheaper for modern automakers to commit       absolutely everything to a touchscreen and then rely on software updates to       improve things. Not only are we now faced with completely homogenous care       interiors, but also the prospect of an increasingly button-free future.               ======================================================================       Link to news story:       https://www.techradar.com/vehicle-tech/hybrid-electric-vehicles/shock-horror-i       n-car-touchscreens-are-way-more-distracting-than-we-first-thought-says-new-stu       dy              $$       --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux        * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470       SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca