TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1843.consprcy@1:2320/105 2da7f90e   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   To repeal or not repeal: UK Parliament discusses the Online Safety Act   
      
   Date:   
   Tue, 16 Dec 2025 14:55:41 +0000   
      
   Description:   
   The debate comes as a petition to repeal the bill got 500K signatures,   
   focusing on controversial provisions around age verification and encrypted   
   apps.   
      
   FULL STORY   
      
   After officially becoming law in October 2023, the Online Safety Act was back   
   in the UK Parliament yesterday after a petition calling for its repeal gained   
   over half a million signatures.    
      
   The petition argued that the law is far broader and restrictive than is   
   necessary in a free society. However, most MPs suggested that rather than   
   being repealed, the legislation should actually be strengthened.    
      
   Brits have long been concerned about the Online Safety Acts potential to   
   encourage online censorship, and have repeatedly highlighted the negative   
   impact mandatory age checks could have on privacy and security.    
      
   Despite not leading to immediate changes, the debate offered an opportunity   
   for MPs to challenge the government on the law's implementation. Here are the   
   main takeaways.   
      
   What MPs are saying on age verification   
      
   Most of the MPs taking part in yesterday's discussion argued that the OSA is    
   a crucial piece of legislation to protect children online. However, some MPs   
   did raise a few challenges around its implementation.    
      
   Specifically, lawmakers discussed concerns around freedom of speech and   
   referenced examples of political discourse being unnecessarily age-gated.    
      
   "What is or is not age-restricted needs to be far clearer, more consistent,   
   and more proportionate," said Independent MP for Dewsbury and Batley, Iqbal   
   Mohamed.    
      
   Some MPs also echoed experts' and citizens' concerns about age verification's   
   negative impact on privacy, with Victoria Collins, a Liberal Democrat MP,   
   arguing that "age assurance systems also pose a problem to data protection    
   and privacy."    
      
   But MPs seemed to be in agreement that none of these challenges warranted a   
   real discussion about the law's future. Instead, the focus remained on   
   refining how the law is implemented.    
      
   A particular area of focus was the use of VPN apps.    
      
   While many people have turned en masse to the best VPN apps to protect their   
   privacy,  lawmakers expressed concern that children could use these apps to   
   evade checks. Consequently, the UK Lords proposed a ban on VPNs for children   
   last week.    
      
   From the debate, it's clear that lawmakers will continue to monitor VPN usage   
   and have not ruled out introducing stricter rules against VPN providers in    
   the coming year.   
      
   Encryption -- not a main concern for MPs   
      
   Besides age verification, digital rights advocates and technologists are aslo   
   concerned about other controversial provisions that are yet to be fully   
   implemented and could pose a risk to end-to-end encryption .    
      
   After all, the UK regulator Ofcom has already shared plans to double down on   
   file monitoring in 2026 , expanding detection requirements of illegal   
   materials to more online services, no matter if these are encrypted.    
      
   Before the debate, Jemimah Steinfeld, CEO at the Index of Censorship, also   
   told TechRadar to be especially worried about the prospect that end-to-end   
   encryption could be broken by future implementation of the law.    
      
   "These apps are a lifeline. Even setting aside the high price that dissidents   
   would pay if they lost that privacy. The average person should have it as a   
   natural right," said Steinfeld. "I then think it's really good that we're   
   having this debate right now."    
      
   Yesterday's debate, however, only touched briefly on this point. This shows   
   that MPs do not share the same concerns as experts, with Labour MP for Milton   
   Keynes Central, Emily Darlington, referring to "easy technological fixes" to   
   avoid breaching encryption protection already existing. Tools that, however,   
   experts have repeatedly said they still break encryption when they were   
   proposed in the EU.   
      
   What's next?    
      
   The OSA debate wasn't a turning point. No, lawmakers have no intention to   
   scrap the Online Safety Act, either  not even its most controversial   
   provisions.    
      
   The discussion gives us an interesting insight, nevertheless, into what MPs   
   are most worried about right now.    
      
   The harm of harmful algorithms and generative AI is certainly what most MPs   
   are pushing to be dealt with next. Yet, as many MPs recognized, there are   
   still many issues with the current implementation as it is. It's then a good   
   sign that this discussion is ongoing.    
      
   That said, to get real change, words may not be enough. Commenting on this   
   point, Director of Government Affairs and Advocacy at the Internet Society,   
   Callum Voge, told TechRadar: "This weeks debate will not be enough to reopen   
   the controversial provisions alone. There will need to be continued public   
   pressure on these issues to ensure that the concerns are really heard and   
   addressed."    
      
   We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses.    
   For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms   
   and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and   
   strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone   
   using a VPN service to break the law or conduct illegal activities. Consuming   
   pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future   
   Publishing.    
      
   ======================================================================   
   Link to news story:   
   https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/to-repeal-or-not-repeal-uk-   
   parliament-discusses-the-online-safety-act   
      
   $$   
   --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux   
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426