TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1807.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d9c368b   
   REPLY: 1:153/757.21@fidonet 2733bbaa   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   > ** On Saturday 06.12.25 - 09:45, Rug Rat wrote to All:   
      
   >  RR> Ohhh..  Now this gives me a nice warm and fuzzy feeling!   
      
   > The article is a bit misleading.  It headlines with VPNs being   
   > bad/weak/insecure ..but then it includes tips on how to select   
   > a good VPN.   
      
   That is because the article switches from reporting what CISA said to what   
   the writer/publisher believes regarding VPN service -- i.e. that a blanket   
   rejection of VPN all together is not good.  I don't see that as misleading.   
    If anything, it is covering both sides which is what reporters are supposed   
   to do (but often don't do any more).   
      
   Important to note that this particular news source often runs inline ads for a   
   VPN provider or two, so they are not going to bite the hands that feed them.   
      
      
    * SLMR 2.1a * Beware of programmers carrying screwdrivers.   
   --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 134 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426