Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,931 of 2,445    |
|    Mike Powell to All    |
|    Meta reportedly makes 10%    |
|    08 Nov 25 10:09:53    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1688.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d7499d9       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed       Meta reportedly makes 10% of its revenue from fraudulent ads and scams              Date:       Fri, 07 Nov 2025 14:40:50 +0000              Description:       Meta apparently makes huge profits from fraudulent ads - so is it in the       companys interest to crack down?              FULL STORY              The number of scam adverts and less than legitimate product listings on        social media platforms certainly seems to have dramatically increased in the       last few years, but a new report claims the websites themselves could be       partly to blame.               Internal projections seen by Reuters reveal Meta, the company behind Facebook       and Instagram, apparently earns a projected 10% of its annual revenue from        the advertising of scams and banned goods - amounting to around $16 billion.               Documents also suggest the social media conglomerate failed to identify and       stop an avalanche of ads, leaving billions of Instagram, Facebook, and       WhatsApp users at risk from the fraudulent ecosystem.              A so-called crackdown               Over the years, Meta has publicized efforts to undergo major crackdowns on       organized crime , pig-butchering scams, and social engineering attacks - even       going so far as to remove up to 2 million accounts from the Facebook        platform.               Meta told TechRadar Pro it is 'aggressively fights fraud ' on its platforms,       'because people on our platforms dont want this content, legitimate       advertisers dont want it and we dont want it either'.               "Scammers are persistent criminals whose efforts, often driven by ruthless       cross-border criminal networks that operate on a global scale, continue to       grow in sophistication and complexity. As scam activity becomes more       persistent and sophisticated, so do our efforts. Unfortunately, the leaked       documents present a selective view that distorts Metas approach to fraud and       scams by focusing on our efforts to assess the scale of the challenge, not        the full range of actions we have taken to address the problem."               But, these new documents revealed that even marketers that were suspicious       enough to be flagged by Metas internal warning systems are often allowed to       continue, only getting banned once the prediction for fraud reaches 95%.               That means, if Meta is 94% sure that an advert is scamming its users - its       allowed to continue. Shockingly, Meta actually makes more money from adverts       it believes to be scams - charging a higher ad rate as a penalty.               So, is there really much of an incentive for Meta to remove fraudsters        preying on users? Even Meta doesnt think so.               In the documents, Meta reportedly weighs up the revenue it earns from scam       adverts, and the regulatory fines that it believes are inevitable if these       high-risk scam ads are not mitigated. Note here that Meta is not suggesting        it would voluntarily do more to vet advertisers in order to protect        consumers, but rather that it would act under threat of impending regulatory       penalties.               Thousands of scams have been spotted on Meta platforms with varying degrees        of success and severity, but criminals are undoubtedly making a lot of money       from these tricks (and so is Meta). In the UK, Meta products were involved in       as much as 54% of all payment-related scam losses in 2023, the report reveals       - outlining just how endemic this problem is, making it all the more        abhorrent that Meta chooses to continue profiting from it.              ======================================================================       Link to news story:       https://www.techradar.com/pro/security/meta-reportedly-makes-10-percent-of-its       -revenue-from-fraudulent-ads-and-scams              $$       --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux        * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664       SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca