Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,854 of 2,445    |
|    Mike Powell to All    |
|    The internet is now mostl    |
|    17 Oct 25 07:47:25    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1611.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d577728       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed       The internet is now mostly written by machines, study finds              Date:       Fri, 17 Oct 2025 01:00:00 +0000              Description:       More new articles online are now written by AI than humans, but most dont        make it into search results.              FULL STORY              More new articles online are written by artificial intelligence than by human       beings, according to a new study from Graphite. Using Common Crawl data,       Graphite found that AI-generated writing had passed the 50% mark of newly       published web articles in November of last year. That figure has plateaued in       recent months, but it's still a huge change in how content is produced.               The study relied on AI-detection tools applied to 65,000 English-language        URLs from the Common Crawl archive, filtering for content with article markup       and publication dates from 2020 to 2025. They classified each article as       AI-generated or human-written based on whether over 50% of its content        matched AI detection criteria. Not that the detector is perfect. The study's       authors estimated false-positive and false-negative rates of about 4.2% and       0.6%, respectively.               The study may come as a surprise to a lot of people because quantity is not       the same as visibility. The study also found that despite the volume of       articles generated by AI flooding the web, most aren't good at SEO and don't       show up often on Google or even in ChatGPT responses. Both tools still       prioritize human-created content, so most AI-authored articles go unnoticed        by everyday readers.               The rise in machine-written content largely tracks with the public release of       ChatGPT in late 2022. In the span of twelve months, AI authorship of online       articles went from basically nothing to close to 40%. Things have slowed down       since then, possibly because of the underperformance of AI articles in search       results.              Yet in terms of sheer volume, the robots are now outpacing their creators.        The balance tilting toward AI represents how media companies, marketers, and       clickbait content farms have sought ways to produce written content without       the most expensive part, writers. The falling cost of high-performing AI        tools only encouraged them. Every generation of model seems to offer faster       speeds and lower prices than its predecessors.               Apparently blind to the source of any successfully performing writing, many       have turned to AI models capable of churning out articles in seconds, with       churn being the appropriate description for the bland slurry that usually       results. The often dull, repetitive, and dully repetitive writing isn't going       to nab eyeballs organically, and Google has openly deprioritized AI content        in its search algorithm.              Internet AI flood               Still, they may be slowly starting to learn the futility of pursuing AI-only       content creation. Graphites data shows that the percentage of new articles       classified as AI-written has stayed flat since May. Publishers may be       recalibrating how they use AI, and skipping full automation.               And while AI-detection tools are imperfect, they are improving. Platforms        that publish low-quality AI content could find themselves penalized more       aggressively by an audience that outright rejects what they produce.               The internet may now be a co-authored space between humans and machines. But       it's the human writing that people actually want to read.               ======================================================================       Link to news story:       https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/the-internet-is-now-mostly-w       ritten-by-machines-study-finds              $$       --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux        * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470       SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca