TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1594.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d523bb8   
   REPLY: 1732.consprcy@1:218/700 2d5009b0   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   RM> I guess it's one of those things where you'd not know what would   
   RM> happen until you tried it. Will it make them want to succeed or   
   RM> just produce a well fed new batch of criminals?   
      
   KW> Science says you're going to raise smarter kids with better mental   
     > health and a better chance at success than kids left hungry without   
     > positive influences.   
      
   KW> There's a spectrum of people out there - some have dreams of a better   
     > life, others may not. Providing nutrition and care to kids when they're   
     > at their peak of development will help the former, and certainly   
     > wouldn't harm the latter.   
      
   One would hope so.. I think there's a major problem when kids are   
   growing up in a very poor income area where, even if they are   
   better looked after than others, there will still be peer pressure   
   to be like everyone around you or you get beat up at school a lot.   
      
   But I don't know if people removed from that hear the true story.   
   You seem to always see on TV shows and such that even the good kids   
   are being forced to join gangs and sell drugs and such and most   
   dropping out of school long before they could even think about any   
   higher education.   
      
   Plus you get the impression that a lot of these kids don't have   
   a father at home and a mother working 3 jobs to keep food on   
   the table so no one around to keep an eye on what the kids are   
   doing after school, or if they are even going to school.   
      
   There's no question, if you can break a kid out of that situation   
   there's an excellent chance that his children will then be more   
   likely to do well too and you end up with generational prosperity   
   rather than poverty.   
      
   I won't pretend to know this stuff inside out but my parents   
   worked harder and got better educations, getting degrees in   
   night school while working, and they ended up pretty well off   
   where most of their siblings did not. Those siblings are very   
   vocal about how our prosperity was because we were just lucky.   
      
   Move forward 50 years and we have 2 more generations and   
   all are fairly well off. Every generation usually does better   
   than the previous one *if they taught that hard work = success*..   
      
   I added that last part because I recently read that people   
   who inherit huge amounts of money, over 60% of them are often   
   bankrupt within 2 generations and that rises to 90% within   
   3 generations. This is the problem with just handing people   
   money that they didn't have to work hard to earn..   
      
   ---   
    * SLMR Rob  * I erased the good Tagline before you could read it   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426