Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,722 of 2,445    |
|    Rob Mccart to MIKE POWELL    |
|    Re: EU rejects claims of    |
|    03 Sep 25 08:16:24    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1470.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d1d7b66       REPLY: 1466.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d1afcae       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed       RR>> ** On a side note. If you are taking unsolicited photos / videos for a       blo        >> vlog etc, and that post or video is monetized, does that cross the line       int        >> needing a photo/video release? That would be a good debate topic              MP>I would say "yes" so as, at the very least, to cover your own arse. If        >they find out your making $$$ on it they will likely want some of the        >profit.              I would say that any time you use a photo for commercial purposes the       subjects in it should have some share ofit. That's a little different       than random photos for your own use.              MP>That said, several years ago I too several photos and a couple of the        >locations (one a lighthouse and another a lake cruise) reached out and        >asked if they could use them to promote their locations. I said yes even        >though I am not getting paid.              Did they see the photos at the time or had you posetd them somewhere later?       Probably as you thought, there'd be very little monney to be made there       and you might just feel good that your photos were considered that good.              MP>> If you say it to them and only them, you are in the clear (Though being       Kor        >> I am sure there are other laws they can get you on.). Though with or       witho        >> oppinion if you saw something to a third party that "defames" them, you       mig        >> want a lawyer on retainer.              I'm not sure if telling the truth about someone, and there's no question       it is true, would be 'defamation'.. Or at least shouldn't be IMHO.. B)              The definition online says defamation falls under two catagories, slander       and libel depending on if it is spoken or written, but they point out       that that refers to making FALSE statements..              ---        * SLMR Rob * Do not judge a book by its movie!        * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470       SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca