home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   CONSPRCY      How big is your tinfoil hat?      2,445 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,722 of 2,445   
   Rob Mccart to MIKE POWELL   
   Re: EU rejects claims of   
   03 Sep 25 08:16:24   
   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1470.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d1d7b66   
   REPLY: 1466.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d1afcae   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   RR>> ** On a side note.  If you are taking unsolicited photos / videos for a   
   blo   
     >> vlog etc, and that post or video is monetized, does that cross the line   
   int   
     >> needing a photo/video release?  That would be a good debate topic   
      
   MP>I would say "yes" so as, at the very least, to cover your own arse.  If   
     >they find out your making $$$ on it they will likely want some of the   
     >profit.   
      
   I would say that any time you use a photo for commercial purposes the   
   subjects in it should have some share ofit. That's a little different   
   than random photos for your own use.   
      
   MP>That said, several years ago I too several photos and a couple of the   
     >locations (one a lighthouse and another a lake cruise) reached out and   
     >asked if they could use them to promote their locations.  I said yes even   
     >though I am not getting paid.   
      
   Did they see the photos at the time or had you posetd them somewhere later?   
   Probably as you thought, there'd be very little monney to be made there   
   and you might just feel good that your photos were considered that good.   
      
   MP>> If you say it to them and only them, you are in the clear (Though being   
   Kor   
     >> I am sure there are other laws they can get you on.).  Though with or   
   witho   
     >> oppinion if you saw something to a third party that "defames" them, you   
   mig   
     >> want a lawyer on retainer.   
      
   I'm not sure if telling the truth about someone, and there's no question   
   it is true, would be 'defamation'..  Or at least shouldn't be IMHO..  B)   
      
   The definition online says defamation falls under two catagories, slander   
   and libel depending on if it is spoken or written, but they point out   
   that that refers to making FALSE statements..   
      
   ---   
    * SLMR Rob  * Do not judge a book by its movie!   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca