Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,683 of 2,445    |
|    Mike Powell to All    |
|    Prusa declares open 3D pr    |
|    25 Aug 25 09:02:50    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1430.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d11a8a0       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       FORMAT: flowed       Prusa CEO declares "open hardware desktop 3D printing is dead" - China blamed       for causing the beginning of the end              Date:       Sun, 24 Aug 2025 19:28:00 +0000              Description:       Prusa declares open hardware 3D printing dead, blaming Chinas subsidies,       patent imbalance, and disputes transformed collaborative innovation into a       competitive and increasingly restrictive global industry.              FULL STORY              The open source movement in 3D printing once thrived on shared designs,       community projects, and collaboration across borders.               However, Josef Prusa, head of Prusa Research, has announced, open hardware       desktop 3D printing is dead.               The remark stands out because his company long championed open designs,       sharing files and innovations with the wider community.              Economic support and patent challenges              Prusa built his early business in a small basement in Prague, packing frames       into pizza boxes while relying on contributions from others who shared his       philosophy.               What has changed, he now argues, is not consumer demand but the imbalance       created when the Chinese government labeled 3D printing a strategic industry       in 2020.               In his blog post , Prusa cites a study from the Rhodium Group which describes       how China backs its firms with grants, subsidies, and easier credit.               This makes it much cheaper to manufacture machines there than in Europe or       North America.               The issue grows more complicated when looking at patents. In China,       registering a claim costs as little as $125, while challenging one ranges        from $12,000 to $75,000.               This gap has encouraged a surge of local filings, often on designs that trace       back to open source projects.               Prusas earlier machines, such as the Original i3, proudly displayed        components from partners like E3D and Noctua, embodying a spirit of        community, but were also easy to copy, with entire guides appearing online       just months after release.               The newest Prusa printers, including the MK4 and Core ONE, now restrict        access to key electronic designs, even while offering STL files for printed       parts.               The Nextruder system is fully proprietary, marking a clear retreat from total       openness.               Prusa argues Chinese firms are effectively locking down technology the       community meant to share - as while a patent in China does not block his       company from selling in Europe, it prevents access to the Chinese market.               A bigger risk emerges when agencies like the US Patent Office treat such       patents as prior art, creating hurdles that are expensive and time-consuming       to clear.               Prusa cited the case of the Chinese company, Anycubic, securing a US patent        on a multicolor hub that appears similar to the MMU system his company first       released in 2016.               Years earlier, Bambu Lab introduced its A1 series, also drawing inspiration       from the same concept.               Anycubic now sells the Kobra 3 Combo with this feature, raising questions       about how agencies award patents and who holds legitimate claims.               Meanwhile, Bambu Lab faces separate legal battles with Stratasys, the        American pioneer whose patents once kept 3D printing confined to costly       industrial use.               Declaring the end of open hardware may be dramatic, but the pressures are       real.               Between state subsidies, permissive patent rules, and rising disputes, the       foundation of open collaboration is eroding.               Via Toms Hardware              ======================================================================       Link to news story:       https://www.techradar.com/pro/prusa-ceo-declares-open-hardware-desktop-3d-prin       ting-is-dead-china-blamed-for-causing-the-beginning-of-the-end              $$       --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux        * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470       SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca