TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1395.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d0c55bf   
   REPLY: 1532.consprcy@1:218/700 2d09f042   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   KW>The reports make it sound like the water isn't recycled and that the water   
   is   
     >sed" by the data center, as if they're talking about continuous use. Whether   
     >t's accurate or not, I don't know. You'd think you could cool the water   
   passi   
     >y and recirculate it, but then you're adding more radiant heat into the   
   envir   
     >ent.   
      
   KW>If water is running through a closed system you wouldn't think there'd be an   
     >ue with treating it and releasing it back into the water supply, but I'm   
   sure   
     >'s not worth the decrease in net shareholder value.   
      
   Yes, I touched on that in a previous message.. I wouldn't think that   
   water used for cooling would be polluted to any great extent, but   
   you are still pulling it out of fresh drinking water in same cases   
   and possibly dumping it into the sewage treatment plants.   
      
   ---   
    * SLMR Rob  * There are only 2 valid opinions - mine and the wrong one.   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 114 206 300 307 317 400 426 428   
   SEEN-BY: 229/470 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426