TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1376.consprcy@1:2320/105 2d087593   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   The U.S. is blocking state AI regulation. Here's what that means for every   
   business   
      
   Date:   
   Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:01:19 +0000   
      
   Description:   
   Congress halts state AI regulation, pushing companies to self-govern amid   
   rapid enterprise adoption.   
      
   FULL STORY   
   ======================================================================   
      
   Congress didn't just reshape tax codes with the "One Big Beautiful" bill; it   
   also quietly reshaped the future of artificial intelligence . A lesser-known   
   provision of the sweeping legislation is now on its way to becoming law: a   
   10-year freeze on state-level AI regulation.    
      
   In other words, no individual state can pass rules that govern how businesses   
   develop or use AI systems. The message is clear for companies rushing to    
   embed AI in daily operations: govern yourselves or risk learning the hard way   
   why guardrails matter. AI tools are showing up in every workflow. with or   
   without oversight.   
      
   AI isn't a side project anymore. It's already embedded in cybersecurity   
   platforms, CRMs , internal chat tools, reporting dashboards and   
   customer-facing products. Even mid-size organizations are training AI models   
   on proprietary data to speed up everything from supplier selection to    
   contract analysis.    
      
   However, the adoption curve has outpaced internal checks. Many teams are   
   greenlighting tools without understanding how they were trained, what data   
   they retain or how outputs are validated. IT leaders often discover AI use   
   well after it's already operational. This kind of shadow Ai creates a major   
   risk surface.    
      
   And now, with state-level oversight blocked for a decade, there's no outside   
   pressure forcing organizations to establish policies or baseline rules. This   
   shift pushes businesses to take even more responsibility for what happens   
   inside their walls.   
      
   Without guardrails, AI can drift; fast    
      
   AI models aren't static. Once deployed, they learn from new data, interact   
   with systems and influence decision-making. That's powerful but also   
   unpredictable.    
      
   Left unchecked, an AI-driven forecasting tool might rely too heavily on   
   outdated patterns, causing overproduction or supply chain bottlenecks. A   
   chatbot designed to streamline customer service could unintentionally    
   generate biased or off-brand responses.    
      
   Meanwhile, generative models trained on sensitive business documents can   
   inadvertently expose proprietary information in future prompts. For example,    
   a study released in January 2025 found that nearly 1 in 10 prompts used by   
   business users when interacting with generative AI (GenAI) tools could   
   inadvertently disclose sensitive data.    
      
   These aren't abstract dangers; they've already appeared in public incidents.   
   But it's not just PR damage that's at stake. AI errors can affect revenue,   
   data security and even legal exposure. The absence of regulatory pressure   
   doesn't make these issues go away  it makes them easier to miss until they're   
   too big to ignore.   
      
   The smart play is internal governance: before you need it    
      
   Organizations are eager to integrate GenAI, with many teams already using   
   these powerful tools in daily operations. This rapid adoption means that just   
   passively monitoring things isn't enough; a strong governance structure is   
   crucial, one that can adapt as AI becomes more central to the business.    
      
   Setting up an internal AI governance council, ideally with leaders from IT,   
   security, compliance and operations, offers that vital framework. This    
   council isn't there to stop innovation. Its job is to bring clarity. It   
   typically reviews AI tools before they're rolled out, sets clear usage   
   policies and works with teams so they fully understand the benefits and    
   limits of the AI they're using.    
      
   This approach reduces unauthorized tool usage, makes auditing more efficient   
   and helps leadership steer AI strategy with confidence. However, for   
   governance to be effective, it must be integrated into broader enterprise   
   systems, not siloed in spreadsheets or informal chats.   
      
   GRC platforms can anchor AI governance   
      
   Governance, risk and compliance (GRC) platforms already help businesses    
   manage third-party risk, policy enforcement, incident response and internal   
   audits. They're now emerging as critical infrastructure for AI governance as   
   well.    
      
   By centralizing policies, approvals and audit trails, GRC platforms help   
   organizations track where AI is being used, which data sources are feeding    
   it, and how outputs are monitored over time. They also create a transparent,   
   repeatable process for teams to propose, evaluate and deploy AI tools with   
   oversight so innovation doesn't become improvisation.   
      
   Don't count on vendors to handle it for you   
      
   Many tools advertise AI features with a sense of built-in safety, which   
   includes privacy settings, explainable models and compliance-ready    
   dashboards. But too often, the details are left up to the user.    
      
   If a vendor-trained model fails, your team will likely bear the operational   
   and reputational costs. Businesses can't afford to treat third-party AI as   
   "set and forget." Even licensed tools must be governed internally, especially   
   if they're learning from company data or making process-critical decisions.   
      
   The bottom line    
      
   With the U.S. blocking states from setting their own rules, many assumed   
   federal regulation would follow quickly. However, the reality is more   
   complicated. Draft legislation exists, but timelines are fuzzy, and political   
   support is mixed.    
      
   In the meantime, every organization using AI is effectively writing its own   
   rulebook. That's a challenge and an opportunity, especially for companies    
   that want to build trust, avoid missteps and confidently lead.    
      
   The organizations that define their governance now will have fewer fire    
   drills later. They'll also be better prepared for whatever federal rules   
   eventually arrive because their internal structure won't need a last-minute   
   overhaul.    
      
   Because whether or not rules are enforced externally, your business still   
   depends on getting AI right.    
      
    This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel   
   where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry   
   today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not   
   necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in   
   contributing find out more here:   
   https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro   
      
   ======================================================================   
   Link to news story:   
   https://www.techradar.com/pro/the-u-s-is-blocking-state-ai-regulation-heres-wh   
   at-that-means-for-every-business   
      
   $$   
   --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 114 206 300 307 317 400 426 428   
   SEEN-BY: 229/470 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426