TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1337.consprcy@1:2320/105 2cfdee66   
   REPLY: 1:135/250@fidonet 6897c9d0   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   > 2) Has Trump raped minors? As much as his affiliation with Epstein would   
   > suggest this, I find this hard to digest. Him fucking everyone's wives I   
   could   
   > believe. But that would be as new news as Clinton screwing anyone. At this   
   > point in time, I'm inclined to believe that H. Clinton stood by her man, not   
   > because of the political power, but because it was no surprise.   
   > I wonder if Foster's "suicide" on the Whitehouse lawn is connected into this   
   m   
   > somehow...but I diverge.   
   > No, I think Trump's involvement in the Files would be more of a financial   
   > nature. Something like money laundering or hidden off-shore accounts enabling   
   > tax-evasion. I just don't see Trump being a pedofile. A philanderer, yes. But   
   > not with children.   
      
   I find it difficult to believe also and wonder if the connection isn't   
   something else.  It would explain why Trump (apparently) believed his name   
   wouldn't be "in the files" only to find out it was.   
      
   As an aside, there are some that don't care if it was kids.  They   
   figure/know that Trump sexually harassed grown women.  They want to know   
   why we don't "listen to the women" instead of waiting for the files.  While   
   I agree with that, some of these people I've known for years and they are   
   the same ones back c1992 that didn't want to "listen to the women" then.   
   Not only did they not want to listen, many were ones that called those   
   women names and questioned their motives.... "she's a money hungry ho,"   
   "she is too ugly for this to be true," etc.   
      
   I find their "listen to the women" act now very ironic considering that   
   anyone whose head hasn't been in the sand knows that Clinton was a   
   philanderer, big time, and yes Hillary knew and put up with it because she   
   wanted to be in the White House.   
      
   I find it odd, and sad, that we weren't "listening to the women" both times.   
      
   Mike   
      
      
    * SLMR 2.1a * Apathy error - strike any key, or none for that matter   
   --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 664   
   SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426