Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CONSPRCY    |    How big is your tinfoil hat?    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,343 of 2,445    |
|    Mike Powell to All    |
|    Generative AI isn't bitin    |
|    30 Apr 25 09:04:00    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1076.consprcy@1:2320/105 2c776dee       PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 202 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 2024 23:04 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       Generative AI isn't biting into wages, replacing workers, and isn't saving       time, economists say              Date:       Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:13:00 +0000              Description:       Generative AI isn't actually saving workers that much time, plus it could be       adding to some workloads.              FULL STORY              According to a new working paper from the University of Chicago's Becker       Friedman Institute for Economics, generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT,        Gemini, and Claude have had minimal to no impact on wages or employment so       far, despite initiation concerns and worker apprehension.               The findings come from a study of around 25,000 workers in Denmark across 11       AI-exposed occupations. The study found no significant changes in earnings or       hours worked after the implementation of these AI tools.               Anders Humlum and Emilie Vestergaard, the paper's authors, also noted no       noticeable economic outcomes, such as total employment and wage bills at the       firm level.              GenAI isn't actually affecting workers that much, study finds               The paper explores how companies can guide their workers, noting that       encouragement and training efforts can boost adoption. Firm-led investments       nearly doubled adoption rates from 47% to 83%, according to the research.               However, the average time savings reported by users was only 2.8% just over       an hour on the basis that an employee is working a 40-hour week. Furthermore,       only 8.4% of workers saw new jobs being created, such as teachers monitoring       AI-assisted cheating, workers editing AI outputs and crafting better prompts.               Contrary to the time-saving promises, Humlum and Vestergaard noted that these       additional responsibilities actually increased workloads in some cases,       meaning that time savings only translated into higher earnings 3-7% of the       time.               The researchers noted: "While AI chatbots are now widely used saving users       time and creating new job tasks, especially in workplaces that encourage        their use their overall impact on the labor market remains limited."               They also noted that "labor market rigidities appear to delay the economic       impact," demonstrating how a company's approach to artificial intelligence        can dictate its success.              ======================================================================       Link to news story:       https://www.techradar.com/pro/generative-ai-isnt-biting-into-wages-replacing-w       orkers-or-saving-time-economists-say              $$       --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux        * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/305 153/7715 154/110 218/700 226/30       SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 111 114 206 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664       SEEN-BY: 229/700 705 266/512 291/111 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 712/848 902/26 2320/0 105 3634/12 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca