Just a sample of the Echomail archive
COMPOSVM:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 264,004 of 264,034  |
|  flexmcmurphy to flexmcmurphy  |
|  Re: SIMH + OpenVMS 5.5-2H4 standalone BA  |
|  26 Dec 25 12:09:25  |
 From: plica2006@gmail.com I think I have figured out what was happening here. The device name (DUAx vs DJAx) assigned to the ISO file depends on what SIMH version you are using: SIMH v4.0-0 maintained by Mark Pizzolato: https://github.com/simh/simh Open SIMH v4.1-0 https://github.com/open-simh/simh If your ISO file is small enough in size then with SIMH v4.0-0 (Mark Pizzolato) you might get the device name: DJA1. In my case I am trying to restore the save_set from an ISO of OpenVMS v5.5-4H2. Because the ISO is only about 204MB SIMH uses its internal logic (autosize) to assign the ISO file a device type of RA60 because that is the closest DEC device capacity drive that 204MB matches with. This is what happens regardless if you start out with this in your ini file: SET RQ3 CDROM ATTACH RQ3 -r openvms_v5.5-4h2.iso So SIMHv4.0-0 responds to a MRSP query from Standalone Backup with a deviceID: (DJ - RA60) indicating that the device at that controller is a removable device of type RA60. (DJ - Removable, DU Fixed). Standalone Backup then uses it's own logic to translate this to a device name DJA3. If you disable AUTOSIZE then you will get DUA3 as the device name: set rq3 cdrom set rq3 NOAUTOSIZE attach rq3 -r openvms_v5.5-4h2.iso This is because SIMH v4.0-0 will now just respond to a MRSP query with whatever device type you define in your ini file. If you use Open SIMH v4.1-0 you will probably just get DUA3 as the device name and not have to disable AUTOSIZE at all. I don't fully understand how SIMH and Open SIMH differ in their device detection logic but it seems that with Open SIMH if you put this in your ini file: SET RQ3 CDROM ATTACH RQ3 -r openvms_v5.5-4h2.iso Then Open SIMH WILL respond to an MRSP query that the device type is CDROM and then Standalone Backup will see this as an RRD40 device and create the device name DUA3. CDROM device are also removable drives but whereas RA60 disks were connected to MSCP controllers RRD40 disks were connected to DSA controllers where any type of local disk were consolidated under DUAx device naming. Not confusing at all! Cheers, Flex -----Original Message----- From: Sam Thomas |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca