Just a sample of the Echomail archive
COMPOSVM:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 263,918 of 264,034  |
|  =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= to All  |
|  Re: DCL2  |
|  06 Dec 25 10:57:35  |
 From: arne@vajhoej.dk On 12/6/2025 10:33 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 12/6/2025 5:42 AM, Marc Van Dyck wrote: >> User written lexical functions, on the other hand, would be a real >> bonus. There are, for one, still many parts of the operating system >> for which you need to get information, and the only possible way to do >> it is to parse some output (think of everything TCP/IP, for example), >> while there is a callable interface available to get the info properly. > > Yes. > > And even though it is possible to run an exe that set a symbol > with lib$set_symbol, then getting it as a lexical would make it > more readable. Note that VSI could add it to existing DCL: f$udl(shrimg, arg1, ...) with a convention of entry point: int udl$function(int narg, enum dcl_type *argtyp, void *argval, enum dcl_typ *rettyp, void *retval) If they wanted to. New lexical functions have been added over time. Arne --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca