Just a sample of the Echomail archive
COMPOSVM:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 263,349 of 264,034  |
|  =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= to David Wade  |
|  Re: VMS previous DEC/CPQ/HP[E] decisions  |
|  16 Sep 25 17:00:43  |
 From: arne@vajhoej.dk On 9/16/2025 4:47 PM, David Wade wrote: > On 16/09/2025 18:46, Simon Clubley wrote: >> Especially given that z/OS is actually several years older than VMS >> and is still going very strongly indeed. > > I don't believe its as strong as you believe. Perhaps the Z platform is, > but z/OS is pretty much limited to traditional big banks and airline > reservation systems. These systems are all much larger that most VMS > systems so migration away is harder and riskier. I am not sure that the attrition rate for z/OS is less than for VMS. But they started at a way higher point, so they are still at a higher point. > Another notable feature of Z hardware is the virtualisation technology > inherent in the "hardware". So it all comes with multiple Logical > PARtitions or LPARs which despite their name are more like physical > partitioning of the hardware, and zVM which uses the "Start Interpretive > Execution" (SIE) instruction to create Virtual Machines. > > DEC never had anything like this. I always considered Alpha Galaxy to be somewhat similar to LPAR. Arne --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca