Just a sample of the Echomail archive
COMPOSL3:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 134,451 of 135,166  |
|  rbowman to Chris Ahlstrom  |
|  Re: naughty Pascal  |
|  06 Jan 26 19:20:55  |
 XPost: alt.folklore.computers From: bowman@montana.com On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 06:33:22 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > The Natural Philosopher wrote this post by blinking in Morse code: > >> On 06/01/2026 03:37, Peter Flass wrote: >>>> >>>> And I still write in Pascal fairly often - like it better than >>>> 'C'. >>> >>> I'm not sure to what extent there was an attempt early on to >>> standardize the extensions, but this would have helped adoption of the >>> language immensely. >> >> AFAIAC Pascal was C in a straitjacket with all the handy bits removed. >> >> I saw no reason to ever use it in preference. > > I remember at work recommending Borland C++, which I really liked based > on Turbo C++ (IIRC). > > Imagine my dismay when seeing weird behavior in the debugger and then > finding out that the VCL framework was... Delphi (Object Pascal). I preferred OWL to MFC but the 500# gorilla won. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca