Just a sample of the Echomail archive
COMPOSL3:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 134,174 of 135,166  |
|  The Natural Philosopher to All  |
|  Re: naughty Python  |
|  01 Jan 26 12:17:01  |
 XPost: alt.folklore.computers From: tnp@invalid.invalid On 01/01/2026 01:07, c186282 wrote: > Ah, Python cheat, 'try/except' ... you don't JUMP > out of an inescapable fabrication, you deliberately > create an error and let the 'except' catch it > further down and out. Then YOU didn't write an > evil jump instruction, just fooled Python into > doing it for you 🙂 Exactly. Every if construct has an implicit goto [IFNOT]. The problem seems to be that three cinatraints, rwo of them aretifical, weem to be in play againts eaxh other. 1. The way machine code operates is full of gotos. 2. The desire of practical coders to have code that is easily understood. 3. The desire of compScis to have code conform to some arbitrary standard of completeness op elegance or some other bollocks. And then impose that on a language. -- In todays liberal progressive conflict-free education system, everyone gets full Marx. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca