XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11
From: robin_listas@es.invalid

On 2025-12-20 22:42, Paul wrote:
> On Sat, 12/20/2025 1:46 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> On 2025-12-20 18:14, Paul wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12/20/2025 7:15 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:


>> I agree with you, but some people tell me that the EU sanctioned way is an
incinerator.
>
> The article here, goes into the detail of all the steps to control the
output.
>
>     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incineration

Long article...

>
> The thing someone was working on here, was some sort of sealed method, so
> it didn't involve large volumes of materials moving though a plant. the steps
> in the Wikipedia description would require a fairly large building to do the
work.
> Even the crude incinerator we used to have, which had the fly ash problem,
> it was a rather large facility. You couldn't see the incineration part, as
> it was up closer to where the crane operator lived. The waste was lifted up
> maybe a hundred feet (above grade) and deposited out of eyesight. The pit
went
> down two hundred feet below grade. (The garbage trucks could dump directly
> at the pit edge.) The incinerator had a stack, but the "fallout" from the
> tall stack, meant the bit that did not fall right at the
> incineration stack... fell at our house.
>
> I doubt that incinerator, had any of the refinements from the Wikipedia
article.

Here, when they want to incinerate something big, say all the cows in a
farm, because they got some infection and they were all killed, is use
(rent?) the burners used to make concrete.

--
Cheers, Carlos.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)