Just a sample of the Echomail archive
COMPLANC:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 242,803 of 243,097  |
|  David Brown to James Kuyper  |
|  Re: printf and time_t  |
|  05 Jan 26 19:28:59  |
 From: david.brown@hesbynett.no On 05/01/2026 19:11, James Kuyper wrote: > On 2026-01-05 11:34, David Brown wrote: > ... >> As I understand it, time_t is intended to be suitable for holding a >> number of seconds ... > > The standard says nothing about that. > >> ... (it is used for that purpose in struct timespec). ... > > The standard says nothing to connect time_t to struct timespec. 7.27.1p4: The range and precision of times representable in clock_t and time_t are implementation-defined. The timespec structure shall contain at least the following members, in any order. The semantics of the members and their normal ranges are expressed in the comments. time_t tv_sec; // whole seconds -- >= 0 long tv_nsec; // nanoseconds -- [0, 999999999] --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca