Just a sample of the Echomail archive
COMPLANC:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 242,770 of 243,097  |
|  Kenny McCormack to All  |
|  printf and time_t  |
|  05 Jan 26 07:19:02  |
 
From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com
Here's kind of an old chestnut...
The question is: How can you reliably printf() a time_t value?
What conversion spec should you use?
The answer seems to be: try stuff until the compiler doesn't warn.
Note that there is now %z for size_t, but there really should be a "Just do
the right thing - you're the compiler, you know what type the arg is, do
the right thing" spec.
It turns out that in my use case, %lu works, but how can you know?
Note, BTW, that another way to do it is to use %d and case the time_t value
to (int), but that seems kludgey.
--
Nov 4, 2008 - the day when everything went
from being Clinton's fault to being Obama's fault.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca