Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    COFFEE_KLATSCH    |    Gossip and chit-chat echo    |    2,835 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,664 of 2,835    |
|    August Abolins to George Pope    |
|    Brain Fog Fix: an excerpt.    |
|    10 Apr 22 13:00:00    |
      MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet fb4fc066       REPLY: 1:153/757.0 6f6f6646       PID: OpenXP/5.0.51 (Win32)       CHRS: ASCII 1       TZUTC: -0400       Hello George Pope!              ** On Thursday 07.04.22 - 09:16, George Pope wrote to August Abolins:               >> I just list them all in alphabetical order by title in my        >> shop.               GP> I prefer book order, as there might be references to past        GP> books that I'd like to read as they're intended:        GP> renminiscences.              Yes.. the traditional expectation would be to tackle a series        in publication order. But a successful series won't make too        many references to the earlier releases. Except for "The        Killing Floor" which is the 1st book one should probably read        when starting out in the Jack Reacher series, the other books        can stand on their own reasonably well.                      GP> Iguess if a customer wanted publication order, you'd just        GP> Google up that list for them, eh?              I keep a small printed list of titles sorted by pubdate.               GP> Of course shelf order would be alphabetical by title with        GP> author(also alphabetical); book shelvbing requires an        GP> abcedarian mind!              It was simply one of those "necessity is the mother of        invention" moments. I got tired of "looking" across two shelves        for a Jack Reacher title. But when laid out in title order, I        know which one's I've got or not.                      >> The Cruise versions? I hear there's a "series" featuring a        >> new actor to play Reacher.               GP> Yeah, plural? I've only sen the one, yup, with Cruise --        GP> why is he made out to be the all-in-one actor -- that's        GP> not as bad as recasting Bruce Willis as an action hero --        GP> I'm still stuck on him in Mnonlighting              Yes.. Cruise did two Jack Reacher films: 2012 and 2016              Cruise's role of Reacher and the Mission Impossible guy tended        to blend as one character for me.                      GP> I'd've missed so much with screaming 'kids' in the        GP> theatre! Kids defined as those acting like such.              Just the overpowering stench of popcorn is enough to make me        want to never set foot in one ever again.              --        ../|ug              --- OpenXP 5.0.51        * Origin: Mobile? COFFEE_KLATSCH = https://tinyurl.com/y56r9f2o (2:221/1.58)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 92/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201       SEEN-BY: 120/340 123/131 129/305 330 331 153/7715 154/10 203/0 214/22       SEEN-BY: 218/0 1 109 650 700 720 802 810 840 850 860 870 880 221/1       SEEN-BY: 221/6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 317 400 424 426       SEEN-BY: 229/428 452 664 700 230/0 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003       SEEN-BY: 282/1038 292/854 301/1 113 812 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200       SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/81 460/58 712/848 5058/104       PATH: 221/1 301/1 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca