home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   COFFEE_KLATSCH      Gossip and chit-chat echo      2,835 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,664 of 2,835   
   August Abolins to George Pope   
   Brain Fog Fix: an excerpt.   
   10 Apr 22 13:00:00   
   
   MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet fb4fc066   
   REPLY: 1:153/757.0 6f6f6646   
   PID: OpenXP/5.0.51 (Win32)   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   TZUTC: -0400   
   Hello George Pope!   
      
   ** On Thursday 07.04.22 - 09:16, George Pope wrote to August Abolins:   
      
    >> I just list them all in alphabetical order by title in my   
    >> shop.   
      
    GP> I prefer book order, as there might be references to past   
    GP> books that I'd like  to read as they're intended:   
    GP> renminiscences.   
      
   Yes.. the traditional expectation would be to tackle a series     
   in publication order. But a successful series won't make too     
   many references to the earlier releases.  Except for "The     
   Killing Floor" which is the 1st book one should probably read     
   when starting out in the Jack Reacher series, the other books     
   can stand on their own reasonably well.   
      
      
    GP> Iguess if a customer wanted publication order, you'd just   
    GP> Google up that list  for them, eh?   
      
   I keep a small printed list of titles sorted by pubdate.   
      
    GP> Of course shelf order would be alphabetical by title with   
    GP> author(also alphabetical); book shelvbing requires an   
    GP> abcedarian mind!   
      
   It was simply one of those "necessity is the mother of     
   invention" moments. I got tired of "looking" across two shelves     
   for a Jack Reacher title.  But when laid out in title order, I     
   know which one's I've got or not.   
      
      
    >> The Cruise versions?  I hear there's a "series" featuring a   
    >> new actor to play Reacher.   
      
    GP> Yeah, plural? I've only sen the one, yup, with Cruise --   
    GP> why is he made out to  be the all-in-one actor -- that's   
    GP> not as bad as recasting Bruce Willis as an  action hero --   
    GP> I'm still stuck on him in Mnonlighting   
      
   Yes.. Cruise did two Jack Reacher films: 2012 and 2016   
      
   Cruise's role of Reacher and the Mission Impossible guy tended     
   to blend as one character for me.   
      
      
    GP> I'd've missed so much with screaming 'kids' in the   
    GP> theatre! Kids defined as those acting like such.   
      
   Just the overpowering stench of popcorn is enough to make me     
   want to never set foot in one ever again.   
      
   --   
     ../|ug   
      
   --- OpenXP 5.0.51   
    * Origin: Mobile? COFFEE_KLATSCH = https://tinyurl.com/y56r9f2o (2:221/1.58)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 92/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201   
   SEEN-BY: 120/340 123/131 129/305 330 331 153/7715 154/10 203/0 214/22   
   SEEN-BY: 218/0 1 109 650 700 720 802 810 840 850 860 870 880 221/1   
   SEEN-BY: 221/6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 206 317 400 424 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 452 664 700 230/0 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003   
   SEEN-BY: 282/1038 292/854 301/1 113 812 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/81 460/58 712/848 5058/104   
   PATH: 221/1 301/1 218/700 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca