Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    COFFEE_KLATSCH    |    Gossip and chit-chat echo    |    2,835 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,022 of 2,835    |
|    August Abolins to Richard Miles    |
|    https://s00.yaplakal.com/pics/pics_origi    |
|    20 Sep 20 10:18:00    |
      MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet e89f8cc5       REPLY: 2:460/58 -1001206383505:138       PID: OpenXP/5.0.46 (Win32)       CHRS: ASCII 1       TZUTC: -0400              Hello Richard!              ** On Sunday 20.09.20 - 16:12, Richard Miles wrote to Kurt Weiske:               kw>> Starting to get a little frustrated with the Telegram        kw>> integration. Fidonet's always been about communication,        kw>> and one of the things I appreciate about it is the long-        kw>> form capability of Fido echoes - most BBSes and offline        kw>> readers support paragraphs and formatting, unlike        kw>> Facebook or Twitter.              The Telegram gate doesn't reduce communication. I think it has        the potential to expand it and reach smartphone initiates.              Paragraphing is possible. All you have to do in TgM is disable        the SEND on CR LF in the settings.                      kw>> When I see a message in a Fido echo with no content save        kw>> for an image URL, I'm reminded that just because        kw>> something can be done, that it doesn't follow that it        kw>> should be done.              We can continue to remind each other to follow some FTN-        etiquette: eg. top-quoting, the little indentation on a quoted        paragraph.                      kw>> Or, maybe I'm just old-school.              Not at all. I think FTN way of doing things has evolved out of        what's better for text communications.                      RM> I do like like seeing some explanation at least. I don't        RM> mind clicking the link to go check it out if I know what        RM> it is. I'm used to doing that on my desktop with my        RM> telnet client and a browser already.              On the TgM side, the image is rendered immediately. That could        have the tendency of making new users lazy on the reply that        just has an image.                      RM> The formatting should be fine and quoting, while not as        RM> easily "pick and choose" as it is in a full screen        RM> editor, can still be done.              I do miss the pick-n-choose paragraph quoting on the TgM side        when using R)eply.              --        ../|ug              --- OpenXP 5.0.46        * Origin: (2:221/1.58)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 114/705 120/340 123/120 131 226/30 227/114 702       SEEN-BY: 229/101 424 426 452 664 1016 240/5832 249/206 317 400 292/854       SEEN-BY: 298/25 305/3 317/3 322/757 342/200       PATH: 221/1 6 153/757 261/38 250/1 8 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca