home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   CLASSIC_COMPUTER      Classic Computers      1,530 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 758 of 1,530   
   Ron Lauzon to Daniel   
   Re: computer chronicles:   
   27 Apr 20 13:35:00   
   
   TZUTC: -0400   
   MSGID: 688.fidoclassicc@1:275/89 230c563c   
   REPLY: 693.fido_classicc@1:340/7 2309f02a   
   PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Win32  Apr 15 2020 MSC 1925   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.10-Win32 r3.159 Apr 15 2020 MSC 1925   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   -=> Daniel wrote to August Abolins <=-   
      
    Da> Even into the late 90s, it was the provider's liability if users did   
    Da> illegal activity using their systems. Sysops were forced to monitor   
    Da> user activity on their bbs's. My sysop watched everything I did. Sort   
    Da> of creepy. Less than a year ago, congress was threatening facebook adn   
    Da> all the other providers with taking the legislation away. The speaker   
    Da> said they were taking advantage of the law and it can be taken away. I   
    Da> thought it was funny as if she was sitting on top fo the government and   
    Da> was holding all the power. That threat fell flat. But anyway, the late   
    Da> 90s gave the provider relief from this liability.   
      
   The law you are referring to was based on the argument that, "If we need to vet   
   everything everyone says on our systems, we can't run our systems and people   
   lose a way to communicate."  So the gov't basically extended a right already   
   given to the phone company.  If someone commits a crime via the phone, the   
   phone company cannot be held responsible because they are neutral 3rd party -   
   or in the case of this law, a "platform" for communication.   
      
   But then the big Leftie companies started suppressing non-Leftie communication.   
    Some people said "Hey!  Wait a minute!  You said that you couldn't do that and   
   run your systems.  So, stop suppressing speech or we will revoke your   
   protection."   
      
   The big Leftie companies said "OK", but really didn't change much.  They just   
   gave their speech suppression better sounding names.  Like "keeping   
   misinformation down" or "cracking down on Hate Speech".   
      
      
   ... I am not 40, I'm 18 with 22 years experience   
   --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52   
    * Origin: Diamond Mine Online BBS bbs.dmine.net:24 (1:275/89)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 14/5 6 15/0 18/0 200 19/36 90/1 106/201 116/18   
   SEEN-BY: 116/116 120/331 340 601 123/0 25 50 115 120 140 150 170 755   
   SEEN-BY: 128/2 135/300 153/7715 154/10 50 218/700 222/2 226/16 30   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/101 426 452 981 1014 230/150 152 240/1120 5832   
   SEEN-BY: 249/1 206 317 400 250/1 261/38 100 266/512 267/155 275/0   
   SEEN-BY: 275/89 91 93 95 98 100 101 201 301 282/1031 1056 291/100   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 300/4 317/3 320/119 219 322/757 340/400 341/66 342/13   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 633/280 640/1321 712/848 801/161 189 2320/105   
   SEEN-BY: 3634/0 12 15 24 27 50 119 5020/1042 5053/58   
   PATH: 275/89 100 261/38 3634/12 154/10 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca