TZUTC: -0700   
   MSGID: 776.fidonet_classicc@1:218/840 29633759   
   REPLY: 378.fidonet_classicc@1:226/18 296317f7   
   PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/86825b66e Jul 10 2023 GCC 9.4.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/86825b66e Jul 10 2023 GCC 9.4.0   
   BBSID: HOVAL   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   -=> Candy Cane wrote to Dave Drum <=-   
       
    CC> TRaSH? Was it that bad?   
      
   They weren't bad at all. That nickname is just from the rivalry at the   
   time.  TRS-80 users eventually adopted the term themselves, capitalizing   
   it to match the TRS of TRS-80 (i.e. TRaSh-80).   
      
   The original TRS-80 model I was eventually outclassed by Apple II's and   
   Commodore 64's. But that was just one model of computer bearing the   
   TRS-80 moniker.  There were the models II, III and 4 which were marketed   
   more towards small and medium businesses. Then there were the Coco's,   
   1, 2 and 3.  The Coco 1, like the Model I, was outclassed by Apples and   
   C64's, but the later CoCo 2 was similar in capability and the CoCo3   
   surpassed them both, but came at a time when people were moving away   
   from 8-bit micros.   
      
   Probably more than you wanted to know lol.   
      
      
   === blueMail/DOS 1.3   
   --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux   
    * Origin: Halls of Valhalla -:- hovalbbs.com:2333 (1:218/840)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/616 123/10   
   SEEN-BY: 123/131 124/5016 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 50 701 203/0   
   SEEN-BY: 218/700 840 220/10 70 90 221/0 6 226/17 18 30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 206 275 307 317 400 426 428 452 470 664 700 240/1120   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 267/800 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 301/1 305/3 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 100 330 340 772/210   
   SEEN-BY: 772/220 230 2320/105 3634/12 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 218/840 770/1 280/464 154/10 229/426