Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CHAT    |    General havoc    |    1,840 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 767 of 1,840    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to Richard Miles    |
|    Re: Censorship    |
|    30 Sep 21 09:01:03    |
      TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815       RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes       TZUTC: 0200       CHRS: UTF-8 2       PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221       MSGID: 2:280/464 61556544       REPLY: 1:3634/24 3ac2cb27       Hi Richard,              On 2021-09-29 13:34:40, you wrote to me:               Wv>> No they can't, they have to stick to the law.               RM> Depends on the country I guess.              Of course. And they are all over the world, which makes it complicated for       them.               RM> In the US, they are sticking to the law. Censorship and the first        RM> amendment apply to federal, state and local government, not private        RM> companies. Those private companies can still be sued or face other        RM> consequences such as loss of business, etc.               RM> Personally I'm in favor of restricting corporate censorship but for now        RM> they are entirely within the law here. In the long run I think that        RM> businesses such as Facebook and Youtube, that are allowed to censor stuff,        RM> bleed over into public policy.              There should be extra rules for these big companies that play a big role in       society.               RM> Where does the line get drawn though?               RM> Child pornography? Rape videos, vaccine misinformation, racist videos?              There shouldn't be a line at all for the companies. When you will leave that       to these companies. they will do it wrong. Because their motive is making       money, not doing the right thing (whatever that may be). You should leave it       to the judicial system.              Maybe there could be teams of special trained cops, with special access to       facebook, youtube, and the like, who check for illegal content. They should be       payed for by taxes payed by these companies.               Wv>> And who are those people that make the judgement on the videos? Are        Wv>> they medical professionals? Is there an appeal procedure?               RM> I seriously doubt it (about being medical professionals).              They are expensive, so I also seriously doubt that. These companies will do       this as cheaply as they can get away with. So if they can do it with mediocre       AI, and not people they will. And you get what you pay for...               RM> As far as I know it can be appealed. Youtube, for instance, allows for        RM> appealing it. As far as I know so do the other social media platforms.        RM> I don't use them enough to really know the correct answer for that.              But how they handle these appeals is probably a secret...              Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)       SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 124/5016 129/305 153/757 203/0 218/840 221/0       SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 360 229/426 428 664 700 240/5832 280/464 282/1038       SEEN-BY: 292/8125 301/1 310/31 322/757 335/364 396/45 423/81 120 460/58       SEEN-BY: 770/1 4500/1       PATH: 280/464 221/1 6 229/664 426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca