Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CHAT    |    General havoc    |    1,840 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 696 of 1,840    |
|    August Abolins to Wilfred van Velzen    |
|    Movies    |
|    04 Sep 21 20:11:00    |
      MSGID: 1:153/757.21@fidonet f41f0564       REPLY: 2:280/464 6133330a       PID: OpenXP/5.0.50 (Win32)       CHRS: ASCII 1       TZUTC: -0400       Hello Wilfred!              ** On Saturday 04.09.21 - 10:45, you wrote to me:               WvV>>> That. And the fact that areas can happily exist without being        WvV>>> elisted...               AA>> But the elist method makes the process self-serve for a        AA>> creator/moderator               WvV> What does this mean?              The initial comms to the bot can be performed at any time, and        some results would come back within an hour or so. If it were        just a "user" requesting to create an echo for a topic of their        interest they would first have to convince their sysop to go        through the trouble to create it and spread the word. Whereas,        the elist-bot method [1] "creates" the echo, [2] establishes a        pretty standardised message with a description, and [3] gets a        spot in a .NA file that is distributed to boards everywhere.                      AA>> *and* the existence of an echo is automatically published        AA>> in its respective .NA file that some bbses refer to see        AA>> "available" echos.               WvV> The elist and the NAB (list) are not the same thing. The        WvV> set of areas in both probably overlap, but are not the        WvV> same.              Why be burdened over that distinction? The whole point is to        announce that an echo exists and anyone, NAB or not, can pick        it up if they want.                      WvV> And being in either list doesn't automatically mean an        WvV> area is available at your link. You still have to check        WvV> the %LIST response.              Noted. At some point people interested in participating in an        echo need to consult with their sysop, or a sysop has to        perform the %LIST and request to add it anyway. But the        initial elist-bot process is something anyone could do to get        something started at their convenience.              Why was the elist-bot system even built in the first place if        it wasn't intended to provide a more organized way to create        and announce the existence of echos?                     --        ../|ug              --- OpenXP 5.0.50        * Origin: Mobile? Join CHAT here: https://tinyurl.com/y5k7tsla (1:153/757.21)       SEEN-BY: 105/81 129/305 134/100 153/757 802 7715 218/840 221/6 229/426       SEEN-BY: 229/428 664 700 282/1038 301/1 322/757 770/1       PATH: 153/757 221/6 229/664 426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca