Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CHAT    |    General havoc    |    1,840 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 389 of 1,840    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to August Abolins    |
|    Re: 7 minutes of terror    |
|    21 Feb 21 17:52:35    |
      TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815       RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes       TZUTC: 0100       CHRS: UTF-8 2       PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221       MSGID: 2:280/464 60329150       REPLY: 1:153/757.21@fidonet eda6e5fc       Hi August,              On 2021-02-21 09:04:00, you wrote to me:               AA>>> I watched a recorded copy of one with a young well-spoken lady        AA>>> introducing different engineers and asking good questions.               WvV>> That probably was before the landing fase?               AA> She covered the whole thing. During the most of the "7 minutes"        AA> part, one of the NASA engineers (the one with a dot on her        AA> forehead) provided the real-time commentary, but she was always        AA> behind on the numbers we saw on the screen.              I saw that.               WvV>> I was annoyed by that too. Because that was the only way        WvV>> to track the progress of the landing. But they switched        WvV>> around to views of the people, which was totally boring...               AA> I would have thought that they would have had a producer that        AA> understood those things and would maintain the gauges on the        AA> screen all the time. It could have been not unlike what they do        AA> on sports shows and elections with the numbers updating on the        AA> screen all the time.              I think they want to cater for a wider audience, but don't realize most of       their viewers are more of the nerd kind, that don't care to much of the people       in the control room and just want to see the figures...               AA>>> The 7 minutes of terror didn't seem so terrifying without that.               WvV>> Indeed.               AA> Too bad they designed the jetpack to be discarded. Why couldn't        AA> it be designed to land safely (farther away from the rover,        AA> ofcourse) and then have wheels that could unfold. Then it could        AA> be another device that could have cameras on it.              Weight. It costs a lot to put kilograms into space. If they put wheels (and       other stuff) on the crane, it would weigh more, and also needs more fuel for       the rockets. And it did have a camera! It took a video of the whole landing       procedure that will be published later (probably because it is still being       transmitted to earth).               AA> Their common practice to discard spent equipment like that on        AA> foreign soil makes me feel not so bad having my fields littered        AA> with old cars and tires. :D              )              Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)       SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 106/127 124/5016 129/305 153/757 203/0 221/0       SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 360 229/426 664 700 240/5832 280/464 282/1038 292/8125       SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 322/757 335/364 396/45 423/81 120 460/58 4500/1       PATH: 280/464 221/1 6 153/757 229/664 426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca