MSGID: 1:153/757.21@fidonet 0f4bf049   
   REPLY: 41271.chat@1:103/705 29dae837   
   PID: OpenXP/5.0.57 (Win32)   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   Hello Rob!   
      
    >> Listening to a couple of old guys misremembering what   
    >> Fidonet is and is not can be a bit depressing actually.   
    >> :/   
      
    RS> I suppose, but at least it was impactful enough to still   
    RS> be remembered!   
      
   But it was remembered poorly; they spoke of it as in the past     
   tense. Fidonet not might be the bustling network that it used     
   to be, but does Fidonet still need to be referred to in the     
   past tense all the time?  They didn't shed any knowledgable     
   light that a modicum of it still exists and is supported by     
   many BBSes.   
      
    RS> Imagine Joe Rogan talking about FidoNet? A FidoNet mention   
    RS> on a podcast with a huge audience is notable, I think. --   
      
   Anyone discussing Fidonet shouldn't be referring to it in the     
   past tense and should provide the resources to identify     
   operating BBSes, the tools required for either a sysop or a     
   user, etc.   
   --    
     ../|ug   
      
   --- OpenXP 5.0.57   
    * Origin: Mobile? Join CHAT here: https://tinyurl.com/y5k7tsla (1:153/757.21)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 15/0 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 129/305   
   SEEN-BY: 134/100 153/0 143 149 757 802 7715 203/0 218/0 1 700 840   
   SEEN-BY: 218/860 870 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 307 317   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 5832 280/464 282/1038 291/111   
   SEEN-BY: 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 396/45 423/120   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2320/105 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 153/757 280/464 103/705 218/700 229/426