TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 870.canada@1:2320/105 2d1ae613   
   REPLY: 1:153/757.21@fidonet 23e8094c   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   RM> Her relatives could never understand how you could be so   
   RM> close to someone you only know through eMail and the rare   
   RM> phone call.   
      
   RM> Best explained to them as a friend who you can complain   
   RM> about your family to without getting into trouble later.. B)   
      
   AA>It could also be because another relative could spill the   
     >trust-relationship to another relative ..and then, as you say   
     >above - that could trigger divisions.   Someone unrelated we   
     >converse with (say one to one via email or even over the phone)   
     >is less likely "to get involved" with the family members   
     >directly.   
      
   Yes.. they've often said that a person is more likely to talk   
   about their problems with a stranger in a bar than with someone   
   they know well..  But, as you suggest, often sooner or later   
   something negative you mention to one close family friend or   
   relative is likely to find its way back to the person you were   
   talking about, accidentally or on purpose..   
      
   Experience has taught me not to say negative things about a   
   female relative to another female relative .   
      
   That's just asking for trouble..   B)   
      
   ---   
    * SLMR Rob  * Gross tonnage equals right of way   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 275 300 307 317 426 428 470 664 700   
   SEEN-BY: 229/705 291/111 292/854 320/219 322/757 396/45 460/58 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 902/26 2320/0 105 304 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 2320/105 229/426