Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CANACHAT    |    Canadian chat conference    |    1,128 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 395 of 1,128    |
|    August Abolins to Rob Mccart    |
|    eTransfer loophole    |
|    20 Mar 23 19:21:00    |
      MSGID: 1:153/757.21@fidonet 069a94b9       REPLY: 385.canada@1:2320/105 287e0dd1       PID: OpenXP/5.0.57 (Win32)       CHRS: ASCII 1       TZUTC: -0400       Hello Rob!               RM> easily and virtually instantly tranfer up to usually $3000        RM> between financial institutions but, any more that that,        RM> and your options are a Bank Draft, a pain and maybe not        RM> free, or write a cheque.              The 24hr limit is $3000. .: you can then send more next around        the same time. But I agree.. that can be annoying when        wanting to settle an outstanding invoice/bill that is just a        bit over $3000, or when multiple bills need to be settled        quickly and the eTransfer is limited to $10K for 7 days.              If eTransfers are having these arbitrary limits, I shudder to        think how restrictive CBDCs could be if they ever get        implemented.                      RM> Cheques work fairly well for me since the larger sums are        RM> generally investment oriented and, since the investment        RM> itself acts as collateral, an uncertified cheque can be        RM> accepted and used instantly.              What indicates that one of those cheques is backed by        collateral? In my experience, all the bank cares about is if        the recipient has sufficient funds to cover the cheque incase        it bounces.               RM> But banks are fairly careful with cheques such as you        RM> can't simply cash a cheque written to you even at the        RM> cheque writer's bank. It must be deposited into an        RM> existing account so the banks can verify things first.              BTW.. Gov't cheques are supposed to be treated differently and        NOT require an existing bank account to cash them. However, I        have come upon several people who face a barrier at the bank        when they want to cash a gov't issued cheque; the bank wants ID        (even though they KNOW the person personally!) *and* they seem        to want that person to have an account at the bank where they        are attempting to cash the cheque! SO.. they come to me, they        endorse the cheque, I pay out the value of the cheque to that        person, and I take the cheque to the bank.                      RM> I think the biggest problem these days, and one of the        RM> things that cause the service charges in banks to be so        RM> high, is how quick they are to give large amounts of        RM> credit to people who often can't afford it.              Nah... the charges are due to "because they can", and we the        public allowed it to become common practice.                      RM> Example: Once I was offered my credit card limit in cash        RM> at 0% interest rate for 6 months. I took my limit out in        RM> full to invest in something so I could make a profit on        RM> that money. An error in knowing how they timed a small        RM> service charge caused the card to go over its limit, which        RM> resulted in a $25 service charge that month.              I get those 0% interest for x-months offers regularly too. But        you have to "borrow" only the amount LESS the charges to make        it balance so you don't go over.              Currently, I have two offers:              [1] 0% on Balance Transfer until May 4 2024 + 3% fee.       [2] 1.99% on Balance Transfer until Jan 2 2024 + 1% fee.              The key is not to place a Balance Transfer that exceeds the        current available credit.                      RM> ...Then they 'punished' me for my overdraft by increasing        RM> my limit on that card by $3500 so I'd have a higher limit        RM> to borrow even more money in the future. Apparently the        RM> only reason people go over their credit limit is because        RM> the limit is too low..              Yes.. some people see a credit limit increase as "free money"        or something. But wrt to overages, it is probably because the        limt is too low indeed - but the bank wins by charging more        fees when that happens.                      RM> I have an impeccable banking history, my Credit Score        RM> often over 890, so I should be a good risk in theory. But        RM> at times I've had enough instant credit available, where I        RM> could take the cash without talking to a live person or        RM> getting approval, and the total of that available credit        RM> has been as much as 20 times my then current annual        RM> income, one single credit card limit was as high as 7        RM> times it.              I like the instant available cash-readiness that a cc (via        balance transfer) or personal line of credit provides. But the        key is to stick with a repayment plan inorder to not get        overwhelmed with interest charge accumulation.              WRT to the 0% example above, I borrow the max that I can,        divide the amount by the number of 0% months in the agreement,        and deposit that amount every month in another account to have        the cash I need when the 0% period is over.              The 0% offers help take the edge off the other credit card        accounts that bear 22%+ interest rate charges.                      RM> And they wonder how some people get totally buried in        RM> debt..              People get overwhelmed with managing the accounts and lose        track, meanwhile the bank raise the borrowing limits and people        use their credit even more.                     --         ../|ug              --- OpenXP 5.0.57        * Origin: Stare into this point intently ->.<- (1:153/757.21)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 105/81 106/201 124/5016 129/305 134/100 153/0 141 143       SEEN-BY: 153/149 757 6809 7715 203/0 218/840 220/70 221/0 6 226/17       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 275 307 317 426 428 470       SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 250/8 267/800 280/464 5003 282/1038       SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234       SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 100 340 772/210 220       SEEN-BY: 772/230 2320/105 3634/24       PATH: 153/757 280/464 770/1 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca