Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    CANACHAT    |    Canadian chat conference    |    1,128 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 386 of 1,128    |
|    August Abolins to Ward Dossche    |
|    eTransfer loophole    |
|    17 Mar 23 21:50:00    |
      MSGID: 1:153/757.21@fidonet 068276c0       REPLY: 2:292/854 16113105       PID: OpenXP/5.0.57 (Win32)       CHRS: ASCII 1       TZUTC: -0400       Hello Ward!              ** On Monday 13.03.23 - 16:17, you wrote:               WD> Direct-deposit here is instantaneous. Also when        WD> transfering to another bank.              Deposits work similarly in Canada too. Although some banks may        impose some delay. But my experience with direct-deposits        (either cash or via transfers between linked accounts in the        same bank) are instantaneous too.              However.. inter-bank transfers - between different banks        (although I've never personally needed to make one) can be a        different story and can take several days to complete.              But I think the process depends on the banks involved. For        instance, when I deliver my property tax payment via cheque to        the municipal office, I will find that the cheque will have        cleared the same day although the municipal office uses one        bank and I use a completely different one.                      WD> Cheques were discontinued here Jan.1 2002, that's now 21        WD> years ago. They were too expensive but I still see them        WD> used in North America, it's a primitive form of paying.              Many companies still utilize cheques. I have no problem with        that. A cheque made out to a business can't be co-signed and        "transfered" to anyone else - that's a pretty good fool-proof        way for a business to receive money. For example, if someone        made a cheque out to my business, and I lose the cheque, no-one        else can pretend to be my business and try to benefit from that        cheque somehow.              However, personal cheques do seem to be subject to fraud every        now and then.                      WD> Chipped cards? We already had 'm like 20 years ago.              Likewise.. the chip has been in place on Canadian credit/debit        cards a very long time already.                      WD> Our debit cards still cannot be used in North America        WD> because of massive debit-card fraud. credit cards need to        WD> be re-activated every 6 months for security purposes in        WD> North America.              I think the problem is inter-country banking. Any out-of-        country transaction needs to be scrutinized and tested more        carefully.              Wrt cc cards being re-activated every 6 months - I never heard        of that. Perhaps your source of information is outdated.                      WD> You know, stories like the one which started this, simply        WD> don't happen here. When I reserved a hotel-room in Calgary        WD> from Belgium last October, within minutes I got a call        WD> from the bank "We are informing you your Master Card has        WD> been used in Calgary. Are you aware?" Same happened when I        WD> booked a hotel in Anchorage AK.              The cc companies here do that too - that is, call or text a        usage notification. Infact, I had such a call myself over 25        years ago when I was in another province purchasing new stereo        equipment components.              As for the eTransfer problem that started this thread, the        outcome is shameful on the part of Interac(tm) who devised the        system. Apparently, not all banks or credits unions were        TESTED to comply with the notifications the same way.       --         ../|ug              --- OpenXP 5.0.57        * Origin: Stare into this point intently ->.<- (1:153/757.21)       SEEN-BY: 15/0 105/81 106/201 124/5016 129/305 134/100 153/0 141 143       SEEN-BY: 153/149 757 6809 7715 203/0 218/840 220/70 221/0 6 226/17       SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 275 307 317 426 428 470       SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 250/8 267/800 280/464 5003 282/1038       SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234       SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 100 340 772/210 220       SEEN-BY: 772/230 2320/105 3634/24       PATH: 153/757 280/464 770/1 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca