Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BINKD    |    Support for the Internet BinKD mailer    |    8,958 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 8,776 of 8,958    |
|    Nicholas Boel to Wilfred van Velzen    |
|    Re: binkd cfg question.    |
|    16 Nov 24 16:00:20    |
      TZUTC: -0600       MSGID: 3381.binkd@1:154/700 2b9e5929       PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/a7f1a24a2 Nov 16 202 GCC 14.2.1       TID: SBBSecho 3.22-Linux master/a7f1a24a2 Nov 16 2024 15:22 GCC 14.2.1       BBSID: PHARCYDE       CHRS: ASCII 1       NOTE: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)       Hello Wilfred,              On Sat, Nov 16 2024 11:34:04 -0600, you wrote:              > Hi Nicholas,              > On 2024-11-16 10:35:03, you wrote to me:              > I'm not trying to stir the pot. I'm just trying to point out that sometimes       > someone with a mailer publicly online 24/7, doesn't need, or want, or can't       > have a full blown node number, a point number will suffice, and is much       > easier to obtain...              Point taken. However, what I originally said briefly covered this, but I       didn't want to go too far into it, especially if it had nothing to do with       what he was trying to do.              > That's it. And of course these are exceptions to the normal, although still       > valid use cases. And if a sender doesn't have the connection info for such a       > point, although publicly available, he has no choice and has to route as you       > say...              Yeah. I wasn't talking about exceptions, though. I was trying to help someone       fix their issue with normal operations. No need to go into extravagant, very       minor use-case, abnormal circumstances (unless the original poster would have       brought something like that up) that could possibly confuse the original       poster even more. Do you agree?              > Btw: Why doesn't your message have a REPLY: kludge?              Probably because it was posted via NNTP with a very old linux console based       client (slrn) that has no idea what an FTN REPLY kludge is. However, if this       one does have a REPLY kludge, and while I'm using the same client via the same       method, we can thank Rob (Synchronet) for fixing it. :)              Regards,       Nick              ... He who laughs last, thinks slowest.       --- SBBSecho 3.22-Linux        * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/700)       SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 705 104/119 105/81 106/201 120/302 616       SEEN-BY: 123/10 124/5016 128/187 129/215 305 153/757 7715 154/10 30       SEEN-BY: 154/50 700 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 700 720 840 860 870       SEEN-BY: 218/880 930 940 220/90 221/0 6 226/18 30 44 50 227/114 229/110       SEEN-BY: 229/114 200 206 275 300 307 310 317 426 428 470 550 664 700       SEEN-BY: 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 5555 282/1038 291/111       SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200       SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26       SEEN-BY: 2320/105 3634/12 5020/400       PATH: 154/700 10 280/464 103/705 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca