TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 60a77d27   
   REPLY: 2:5030/1997@fidonet 60a75b46   
   Hello Alexey,   
      
   On Friday May 21 2021 10:03, you wrote to Dumas Walker:   
      
    AF> If by "messages they were looking for" you mean NOT binkp protocol   
    AF> messages but some netmail or echomail messages, then it's just a   
    AF> terrible design flaw and should be addressed in completely different   
    AF> way instead of trying to ban someone who is not doing anything   
    AF> harmful.   
      
   I think you hit the nail right on the head. Using net/999 for all applicants   
   is a basic flow because it will go wrong when there are two applicants at the   
   same time. That flaw has always been there but in the POTS age it was very   
   rare that two application windows overlapped and applicants did not poll every   
   few minutes for the responce to an application.   
      
   It is not really binkd related and I have no instant solution...   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 30/0 80/1 90/1 105/81 114/709 120/340 123/131 129/305   
   SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/101 200 424 426 550   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 720 1016 1017 240/1120 5832 249/109 206 307 317   
   SEEN-BY: 261/38 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 301/0 1 101 103   
   SEEN-BY: 301/113 123 812 322/757 341/66 342/200 633/280 712/848 5019/40   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/1042 5053/58 5058/104   
   PATH: 280/5555 301/1 229/426