TZUTC: 1100   
   MSGID: 2189.fido-binkd@3:633/410 246ce496   
   REPLY: 1:229/426 86788190   
   PID: Synchronet 3.17c-Linux  Nov  3 2019 GCC 4.6.3   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.10-Linux r3.146 Nov  3 2019 GCC 4.6.3   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   -=> On 01-17-21 12:50, Nick Andre wrote to Wilfred Van Velzen <=-   
      
    NA> I asked for the same thing over the years. I'm wondering why the   
    NA> arrogance insist that we kill things by Pid instead of telling the   
    NA> program to exit gracefully. The program checks for modifcations to the   
    NA> config file; it could easily just check for a dummy file and close up   
    NA> shop.   
      
   "kill" by default sends a SIGTERM to the process, which tells it to shut down   
   gracefully.  At least on a *NIX OS.   
      
      
   ... Don't itch for what you don't intend to scratch.   
   === MultiMail/Win v0.52   
   --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux   
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 129/305 226/30 227/114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/101 200 424 426 550 664 1016 1017 240/5832 249/109 206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/307 317 292/854 322/757 342/200 633/0 267 280 281 384   
   SEEN-BY: 633/410 412 416 509 640/1384 712/848   
   PATH: 633/410 280 229/426