TZUTC: -0400   
   MSGID: 817.fido-binkd@1:3634/12 2317f206   
   REPLY: 2:5030/1997@fidonet 5eb2a967   
   PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Linux  May  4 2020 GCC 7.5.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Linux r3.172 May  5 2020 GCC 7.5.0   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104   
     Re: -64 and -46 option missing in 101   
     By: Alexey Fayans to Alan Ianson on Wed May 06 2020 15:11:18   
      
      
    AI>> We could use some kind of in house certificates in fidonet. We would   
    AI>> have to build and maintain all that.   
      
    AF> There are many options. For example, have centralized certificate   
    AF> issuer or have pubkeys in nodelist or DNS. The only problem is that   
    AF> there is no standard to implement.   
      
   remember, too, that in fidonet/FTN, the protocol comes first... then the   
   standard is written based on what is most widely used by the participants...   
   if one must have a standard to start with, RFCs are available and then things   
   can be modified to fit FTN methods from there...   
      
      
   )\/(ark   
   --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux   
    * Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 14/6 18/0 19/10 90/1 103/705 116/116 120/340 601   
   SEEN-BY: 123/0 25 50 115 150 170 755 135/300 153/7715 154/10 203/0   
   SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 242 360 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 200 426 664   
   SEEN-BY: 229/1014 230/0 240/2100 5138 5832 5853 6309 249/109 307 317   
   SEEN-BY: 261/38 280/464 5003 5555 288/100 292/854 8125 300/4 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 320/219 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 633/280 640/1138 1321 1384   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119 3634/0 12 15 27   
   SEEN-BY: 3634/50 119   
   PATH: 3634/12 640/1384 221/1 280/464 240/5832 229/426