Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BINKD    |    Support for the Internet BinKD mailer    |    8,958 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,864 of 8,958    |
|    Michiel van der Vlist to mark lewis    |
|    -64 and -46 option missing in 101    |
|    02 May 20 10:29:04    |
      TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919       TZUTC: 0200       CHRS: UTF-8 4       PID: GED+W32 1.1.5-b20170303       MSGID: 2:280/5555 5ead2f50       REPLY: 721.fido-binkd@1:3634/12 2311c22d       Hello mark,              On Friday May 01 2020 16:41, you wrote to me:               MvdV>> Binkd does nothing with the packets. As you once said it is "just a        MvdV>> filer". It is other software, such as a tosser that deals with the        MvdV>> packets. There is nothing stopping sysops from having the binkd        MvdV>> session password different from the tosser's packet password.               ml> on the one hand, this is true... if one is talking about binkd...              This is the binkd area. The word "binkd "appears twice in my above comment.       The source of this subthread is Benny P. miouwing about an alleged "clear text       password problem" in binkd. Of course I am talking about binkd.               ml> my part of the discussion was leaning more toward binkp, though...              You neglected to inform the audience about that change of context...              Plus that I see no mention of an 8 characer limitation on the password in the       binkp docs...               ml> i'm not saying that it is correct for mailers to validate packets        ml> against the session password... i'm just saying that there are/were        ml> some that do/did...              Irrelevant what some others do/did. We are not discussing those others, we are       discussing session passwords in binkd.               MvdV>> In fact some say NOT having them the same increases security.               ml> yeah, i've heard that, too ;)              I agree with "some". A 24 byte non ASCII case sensitive password is harder to       brute force than an 8 character case insensitive ASCII password. ==> increasd       security.                     Cheers, Michiel              --- Fmail, Binkd, Golded        * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 601 220/50 226/30 227/114 229/100 101       SEEN-BY: 229/200 426 664 1014 240/5832 249/109 307 317 292/854 342/200       PATH: 280/5555 464 229/101 426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca