TZUTC: -0400   
   MSGID: 721.fido-binkd@1:3634/12 2311c22d   
   REPLY: 2:280/5555 5eac84a9   
   PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Linux  Apr 30 2020 GCC 7.5.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Linux r3.170 Apr 30 2020 GCC 7.5.0   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104   
     Re: -64 and -46 option missing in 101   
     By: Michiel van der Vlist to mark lewis on Fri May 01 2020 22:20:56   
      
      
    TK>>> The best way is to set the same pkt and session password.   
      
    ml>> exactly and since the packet header has only eight characters   
    ml>> allocated for the packet password, there we are ;)   
      
    MvdV> Binkd does nothing with the packets. As you once said it is "just   
    MvdV> a filer". It is other software, such as a tosser that deals with   
    MvdV> the packets. There is nothing stopping sysops from having the   
    MvdV> binkd session password different from the tosser's packet password.   
      
   on the one hand, this is true... if one is talking about binkd... my part of   
   the discussion was leaning more toward binkp, though...   
      
   i'm not saying that it is correct for mailers to validate packets against the   
   session password... i'm just saying that there are/were some that do/did...   
      
    MvdV> In fact some say NOT having them the same increases security.   
      
   yeah, i've heard that, too ;)   
      
      
   )\/(ark   
   --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux   
    * Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 601 220/50 226/30 227/114 229/100 101   
   SEEN-BY: 229/200 426 664 1014 240/5832 249/109 307 317 292/854 342/200   
   PATH: 3634/12 640/1384 221/1 280/464 229/101 426