REPLY: 597.fido-binkd@1:3634/12 22e5cf72   
   MSGID: 2:280/464.47@fidonet 5e80a934   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   TID: CrashMail II/Linux 1.7   
    ml>> don't get confused by the chicken and the egg syndrome... binkd   
    ml>> came first and the FTSC documents came after ;)   
      
    Oli>> Before BinkD and FTS-5005 there was the original BinkleyTerm   
    Oli>> mailer that defined BSO in 1990.   
      
    ml> yes... this is true...   
      
    Oli>> The FTSC documented the original BSO de facto standard.   
      
    ml> document number, please... i'm unable to find any such document aside from   
    ml> FSP-1034/FRL-1034 which was the first attempt at documenting BSO back in   
   like   
    ml> 2005... it wasn't picked up and anything done with it until 2014...   
      
   The document number is in the paragraph you've quoted   
      
   http://ftsc.org/docs/fts-5005.003   
      
    >> I  wonder why the Binkd developers decided that they don't have   
    >> to follow that standard in the sample binkd.cfg that is   
    >> distributed with binkd.   
      
    ml> what standard? please provide the document number...   
      
    ml> also remember that binkleyterm is POTS while binkd is internet and the   
   only thing   
    ml> common between them is the BSO...   
      
   POTS or TCP/IP, the only thing that matters is that BinkleTerm is the   
   reference implementation for 4D and 5D BSO.   
      
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707   
    * Origin: kakistocracy (2:280/464.47)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101   
   SEEN-BY: 229/200 426 1014 240/5832 249/109 307 317 280/464 5003 5555   
   SEEN-BY: 288/100 292/854 310/31 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1   
   SEEN-BY: 2452/250   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426