TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
   MSGID: 2:280/464 5e7e20cf   
   REPLY: 323.fido_binkd@1:135/371 22e349f2   
   Hi Eric,   
      
   On 2020-03-27 10:50:23, you wrote to me:   
      
    ER>>> So, Lately I've noticed that my BinkD, which is configured with 2   
    ER>>> domains now, instead of just one.   
      
    ER>>> domain fidonet /bbs/mailer/outbound 1   
    ER>>> domain gatornet /bbs/mailer/outbound 1   
      
    ER>>> This is causing some interesting issues that, when binkd tries to   
    ER>>> "call" Z:N/NNN, it first tries to call Z:N/NNN@fidonet, and if that,   
    ER>>> for any reason fails, it tries to callout to Z:N/NNN@gatornet, which   
    ER>>> fails IF it connects because the remote end doesn't have that AKA as   
    ER>>> @gatornet.   
      
      
    ER> Well, kinda sorta yes. I have a nodelist.nl, which is converted from FTN   
    ER> style to BinkD style, and it has everything there as Z:N/NNN@fidonet, for   
    ER> that nodelist. These are converted using the nl2binkd perl script.   
      
   But you also must have some "manual" node lines in your config for your secure   
   links, so you can specify a password for them?   
      
   And your 'address' lines are also 5D?   
      
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101   
   SEEN-BY: 229/200 426 1014 240/5832 249/109 307 317 280/464 5003 5555   
   SEEN-BY: 288/100 292/854 310/31 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1   
   SEEN-BY: 2452/250   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426