TID: FMail-W32 2.1.3.7-B20170919   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: CP850 2   
   MSGID: 2:280/5555 5df8db5f   
   REPLY: 2:5030/1997@fidonet 5df8cc59   
   Hello Alexey,   
      
   On Tuesday December 17 2019 15:31, you wrote to me:   
      
    AF> I mean something different. For example, if it would be somehow   
    AF> possible to store CA pubkey in the nodelist, it could work.   
      
   That would mean a significant redesign of the format of the nodelist. WHich   
   would make a lot of nodelist processing sofware go in a flat spin. I am not   
   sure we should go that way...   
      
    AF> Or we could have a global FIDONET CA. :)   
      
   Experience with previous "centralised authority" in Fidonet tells me this is a   
   bad idea. Can you say "echolist"?   
      
   If I have to choose between the two evils of a centralised authority within   
   Fidonet or one outside Fidonet, I'd pefer the latter. At last the latter   
   presumably has no interest in playing fidonet politcal games.   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303   
    * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 6 227/114 229/101 200   
   SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 1014 240/5832 249/307 317 280/464 5003 5555 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 310/31 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5019/40   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/1042 5053/58   
   PATH: 280/5555 464 229/426