Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BINKD    |    Support for the Internet BinKD mailer    |    8,958 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,449 of 8,958    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to Richard Menedetter    |
|    Re: Binkd and TLS    |
|    14 Dec 19 11:11:54    |
      TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815       RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes       TZUTC: 0100       CHRS: UTF-8 2       PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221       MSGID: 2:280/464 5df4b577       REPLY: 2:310/31 5df4a1d2       Hi Richard,              On 2019-12-14 09:46:10, you wrote to Oli:               WV>>> You can't compare binkp and http in that regard.        Ol>> Of course you can. Encrypted data transmission over TCP/TLS.        Ol>> Content can be anything.               RM> I think the above comment was about http vs binkp. (not https vs. binkps)        RM> The point I think was that http is completely unencrypted, and binkp is        RM> usudally encrypted after the first packet exchange.              Exactly!              Bye, Wilfred.              --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815        * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/101 200       SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 1014 240/5832 249/307 317 280/464 5003 5555 292/854       SEEN-BY: 310/31 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250       PATH: 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca