TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
   MSGID: 2:280/464 5df42588   
   REPLY: 1:153/757 5df41fe7   
   Hi Alan,   
      
   On 2019-12-13 15:31:14, you wrote to me:   
      
    WV>> But I don't see it's absolute usefullness. Because binkd already   
    WV>> encrypts (most) sessions. Only the initial connection setup is   
    WV>> unencrypted. But that only contains already public information. Maybe   
    WV>> if you live under a really surpressive regime, and you want to hide   
    WV>> the fact you are communicating in fidonet? Maybe it helps a bit... But   
    WV>> not if they take a closer look, at which IP's you communicate with all   
    WV>> the time...   
      
    AI> I'm not absolutely sure of all the implications. I prefer binkps for the   
    AI> same reasons I prefer https.   
      
   You can't compare binkp and http in that regard.   
      
    AI> I just polled your node over binkps and it seemed to work. :)   
      
   Thanks for testing! ;)   
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/101 200   
   SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 1014 240/5832 249/307 317 280/464 5003 5555 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 310/31 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426