home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   BINKD      Support for the Internet BinKD mailer      8,958 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 6,435 of 8,958   
   Wilfred van Velzen to Oli   
   Re: binkp TLS   
   14 Dec 19 00:13:27   
   
   TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0100   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
   MSGID: 2:280/464 5df41d5c   
   REPLY: 2:280/464.47@fidonet 5df4004b   
   Hi Oli,   
      
   On 2019-12-13 22:03:43, you wrote to Tommi Koivula:   
      
    TK>> === Cut ===   
    TK>> node 2:221/6 -pipe "openssl s_client -quiet -alpn binkp -connect   
    TK>> news.fidonet.fi:24567" *   
    TK>> === Cut ===   
      
    Ol> alternatice command is   
      
    Ol> node 2:221/6 -pipe "ncat --ssl-alpn binkp *H *I" news.fidonet.fi:24567   
      
    Ol> The alpn stuff is only needed if the server demands it (e.g when running   
    Ol> webserver, xmpp server, binkp on port 443).   
      
   My version of ncat and openssl don't know about -alpn. Maybe my linux is too   
   old?   
      
   And I think it's better to use --ssl-verify with ncat.   
      
    Ol> I wonder, if we should directly jump to QUIC instead of implementing   
    Ol> TLS over TCP?   
      
   It's probably too new. And not supported yet on a lot of systems? How do you   
   check anyway? ;)   
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/101 200   
   SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 1014 240/5832 249/307 317 280/464 5003 5555 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 310/31 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca