Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BINKD    |    Support for the Internet BinKD mailer    |    8,958 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,381 of 8,958    |
|    Oli to Andrew Leary    |
|    Unixtime in M_GOT frames    |
|    10 Nov 19 10:49:27    |
      REPLY: 2:280/464.47@fidonet 5dc7d614       MSGID: 2:280/464.47@fidonet 5dc7e68a       CHRS: UTF-8 4       TZUTC: 0100       TID: CrashMail II/Linux 1.7        AL>> Incidentally, I discovered that the timestamp of that file on        AL>> disk was showing as November 25, 1961, so it should be a negative        AL>> value. Converting the decimal to hex yields FFFF FFFF F0C4 3650,        AL>> which in 2's complement notation is -255576496. A quick Unix        AL>> time conversion results in Sat 25 Nov 1961 10:31:44 PM UTC.        AL>> Therefore, it appears that the value is a correct 64-bit Unixtime        AL>> for the file timestamp as it was on disk.               Ol> I polled your system with tcpdump running and sent a .pkt from 1966.        Ol> It looks like a binkd bug to me:               Ol> M_FILE 7eee1e8f.pkt 450 18446744073609551616 0        Ol> instead of        Ol> M_FILE 7eee1e8f.pkt 450 -100000000 0              The Binkp/1.0 spec (FTS-1026) says:               In the basic implementation: size, unixtime and offset        MUST be positive numbers or zero.              What is the "basic implementation"? binkp/1.0 without any OPTs?       binkp/1.1 allows a "-1" offset.              The spec also states:        File_size, unixtime and file_offset are decimal integers.        Implementation note: mailer MUST check received string to        prevent number overflow and skip file if overflow.              What to do with the situation now? We have one implemenation that sends a       negative unixtime and another implementation that returns a timestamp that is       584 biliion years in the future.              I wish a negative unixtime were allowed by the specification in the first       place.              --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707        * Origin: * nigirO (2:280/464.47)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/101 200       SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 1014 240/5832 249/307 317 280/464 5003 5555 292/854       SEEN-BY: 310/31 342/200 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250       PATH: 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca