Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BINKD    |    Support for the Internet BinKD mailer    |    8,958 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,375 of 8,958    |
|    Andrew Leary to Oli    |
|    Unixtime in M_GOT frames    |
|    09 Nov 19 17:04:08    |
      REPLY: 2:280/464.47@fidonet 5dc6c668       MSGID: 1:320/219@fidonet 5dc75662       CHRS: CP437 2       TZUTC: -0500       TID: MBSE-FIDO 1.0.7.13 (GNU/Linux-x86_64)       Hello Oli!              09 Nov 19 14:32, you wrote to me:               AL>> Binkp: M_GOT "SIOREG.ZIP 21096 18446744073453975120" +               Ol> That is an interesting unix timestamp, which doesn't fit into a 64-bit        Ol> signed integer.              I noticed that too. It definitely looks like someone is treating it as        unsigned instead of signed.               Ol> 18446744073453975120 / 2 -> November 16, 219250464               Ol> Even if this were in nanoseconds it would be a date far in the future:        Ol> July 21, 2554               AL>> I need to add logging of the sent M_FILE messages to confirm that        AL>> mbcico is sending a 32-bit value in the M_FILE. You can see that        AL>> the remote (binkd 1.1a-99/Linux) is sending a 64-bit value for        AL>> the Unixtime in the M_GOT frame.              I'll have to tcpdump the incoming packets to be sure, but I've never seen that        happen with any other node.               Ol> Looks like a bug to me that needs fixing. Are you sure that binkd        Ol> sends this number?              Definitely a bug somewhere; I just need to establish for sure whether it's in        mbcico or binkd.               Ol>>> Does it break compatibility with any mailer? You didn't mention        Ol>>> any specific example.               AL>> mbcico (the mailer included with MBSE BBS) rejects the M_GOT with        AL>> the 64-bit value and ends up trying to send the file again in the        AL>> next session. I suspect that ifcico (which mbcico was based on)        AL>> will do the same, although I haven't tested it yet.               Ol> Every mailer should reject that M_GOT, the value doesn't make any        Ol> sense.              Incidentally, I discovered that the timestamp of that file on disk was showing        as November 25, 1961, so it should be a negative value. Converting the        decimal to hex yields FFFF FFFF F0C4 3650, which in 2's complement notation is        -255576496. A quick Unix time conversion results in Sat 25 Nov 1961 10:31:44        PM UTC. Therefore, it appears that the value is a correct 64-bit Unixtime for        the file timestamp as it was on disk.              Andrew              --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707        * Origin: Phoenix BBS * phoenix.bnbbbs.net (1:320/219)       SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 16/0 90/1 103/705 120/544 123/130 131 132/174 142/926       SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 242 360 227/114 229/101 200 354 426       SEEN-BY: 229/1014 230/0 240/5832 249/307 317 261/38 280/464 5003 5555       SEEN-BY: 292/854 310/31 320/119 219 322/0 342/200 396/45 423/81 120       SEEN-BY: 640/1384 712/848 770/1 2452/250       PATH: 320/219 221/1 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca