TZUTC: -0700   
   MSGID: 1641.bbs_inte@1:103/705 2a5b5789   
   REPLY: 1:129/305 4a962f1d   
   PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Win32 master/21138cb29 Mar 11 202 MSC 1916   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/52afd2408 Mar 11 2024 22:10 GCC 12.2.0   
   COLS: 80   
   BBSID: VERT   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105   
     Re: Re: RA to SBBS QWK Networking?   
     By: T.J. Mcmillen to Rob Swindell on Sat Mar 16 2024 06:47 am   
      
    > RS> In my experience, a QWK network is much easier to manage or join for   
    > RS> every involved so long as their software supports it.   
    >   
    > But it also leaves it open for a abuse.   
      
   That's up to the network operator how "open" their QWK network is or is not.   
   DOVE-Net is very damn open and the few abuse cases over the years have been   
   easy to deal with pretty quickly. And abusers tend to get bored and move on to   
   other things. It's not really an issue.   
   --    
                                               digital man (rob)   
      
   Sling Blade quote #1:   
   Karl: I've killed Doyle with a lawn mower blade. Yes, I'm right sure of it.   
   Norco, CA WX: 61.4øF, 55.0% humidity, 1 mph W wind, 0.15 inches rain/24hrs   
   --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 128/260 129/305 135/225   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 218/0 1 601 700 870 910 930 940 226/30 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 200 206 275 307 317 400 426 428 470 550 664 700   
   SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 320/219 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426