MSGID: 1:229/426 8C51E1E3   
   REPLY: 1:340/1101 012c2848   
   On 11 Jun 23  04:44:00, Shurato said the following to Joe Phigan:   
      
   S> Websockify.  That worked great and supported the SSL certificate.  Now   
   S> everything except for ftelnet itself is run internally through SSL.  I'm sur   
   S> people will feel a lot more comfortable now, if they care about their BBS   
   S> traffic being sniffed (which is rather unlikely to happen, or cause anything   
   S> to be concerned about if it were to occur).   
      
   This topic comes up every few years or so and sometimes ends up a wildly silly   
   debate on the secure-factor... for a technology never designed for it.   
      
   If someone wants to jump through hoops to get SSL working for a BBS thats   
   fine, but no caller I've ever encountered in 30+ years ever cared about the   
   encryption of the connection.   
      
   Atreyu   
      
   --- Renegade vY2Ka2   
    * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 15/0 16/0 19/10 37 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 123/130   
   SEEN-BY: 123/131 124/5016 129/305 142/104 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0   
   SEEN-BY: 221/0 1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 200 206 275   
   SEEN-BY: 229/307 317 400 426 428 470 550 664 700 230/0 240/1120 5832   
   SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/119 219 319 2119 322/0 757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 423/81 120 460/16 58 256 1124 633/280 712/848 770/1 5054/30   
   PATH: 229/426 460/58 280/464 221/1 320/219 229/426